Re: [ITP] gtk-doc

2004-06-22 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 17:19:46 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz > > > Since I have gtk-doc installed and I'm the maintainer tobe I don't see > > why it is needed to remove the flag. However, it is not much more work > > as I already have loaded on my plate to provide also a gtk-doc package > > since it is

Re: [ITP-3] glib2-2.4.2-1

2004-06-22 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit P. Haase wrote: | Now I reconfigure with my patched libtool, the patch will grow but it | will work for sure (now also with --disable-gtk-doc which in fact makes | the doc package smaller). | | The new package to replace the old one is posted aga

RE: base-files request

2004-06-22 Thread John Morrison
I've just been reading what Debian does with it's base-files, it includes several license texts. Would it be useful for Cygwin to do that too? Then we could just point folks to their own machine :) If we did, is GPL the only license? J.

Re: CMake 2.0.2-1 ready

2004-06-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 22 10:57, William A. Hoffman wrote: > At 10:23 AM 6/22/2004, you wrote: > >What about cmake-1.6.7-1? Can that get removed? > > Yes, it can be removed. Ok, done. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Co-Project Leader mailto:

Re: db4.2 packaging suggestion

2004-06-22 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Max schrieb: > The html docs for the db4.2 command line utilities are in the > libdb4.2-devel package and installed into > /usr/share/doc/libdb4.2-devel-4.2.52. This causes the link to them > from the main db documentation to be broken. I suggest that > either all the docs be installed in /usr/sha

Re: CMake 2.0.2-1 ready

2004-06-22 Thread William A. Hoffman
At 10:23 AM 6/22/2004, you wrote: >Uploaded. Thanks. >I've removed the prev and curr lines. They aren't necessary as long as you >don't have a weird version number ordering. OK, we will remove them. >What about cmake-1.6.7-1? Can that get removed? Yes, it can be removed. -Bill

Re: CMake 2.0.2-1 ready

2004-06-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 22 08:53, William A. Hoffman wrote: > Here are the required files: > > ftp://www.cmake.org/pub/cmake/cygwin/setup.hint > ftp://www.cmake.org/pub/cmake/cygwin/cmake-2.0.2-1.tar.bz2 > ftp://www.cmake.org/pub/cmake/cygwin/cmake-2.0.2-1-src.tar.bz2 Uploaded. > # CMake setup.hint file for cygw

CMake 2.0.2-1 ready

2004-06-22 Thread William A. Hoffman
There has been a new release of the official cmake (2.0.2). This is a major release from 1.8.3 to 2.0.2 Changes in CMake 2.0.2: - Remove automatic -I for source directory with makefile generator. Problems caused by this can be fixed with this command: INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES(${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURC

RE: Request to publish subversion packages after self-review

2004-06-22 Thread Morrison, John
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 21 10:15, Morrison, John wrote: >> Max Bowsher wrote: > I guess that's ok. Otherwise this package will never make it into the > release so, Max, please upload. *wild applause* Yay! Thanks Max and Corinna :) J. This e-mail has come from Experian International:

Re: Request to publish subversion packages after self-review

2004-06-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 21 10:15, Morrison, John wrote: > Max Bowsher wrote: > > No one has reviewed my subversion source package, so I > > started tried to do it myself, by trying to build in a new clean > > minimal cygwin install. > > > > I found and fixed number of problems - mostly missing build > > requiremen

RE: base-files request

2004-06-22 Thread Morrison, John
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, John Morrison wrote: >>> From: Igor Pechtchanski >> done < base-files-manifest.lst > ^^^ > Shouldn't this be "/etc/preremove/base-files-manifest.lst"? humm, prob, I didn't know where the script was run from, but a full pa