Max Bowsher schrieb:
IT WILL NOT WORK!
Try it yourself if you like.
Ah sure, static PE imports.
So we just have to use delay loading for ld, similar to the MSVC linker.
Then via some kind of libcygdelay.a with a symlink resolver before
LoadLibrary().
Wine winegcc has it.
http://www.mail-archive
Hi all. I am attempting to run setup.exe, version 2.427 under Windows 2000
Professional on a Toshiba laptop. After making all the setup option
selections, the setup fails, with a dialog window saying 'setup.exe has been
terminated by Windows. You will need to restart the program'.
The first tim
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 23:42 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Unless we add explicit copy-constructors to every single class, I'd rather
> just leave it out and let the compiler handle things implicitly? It seems
> cleaner to me.
I think you'll find every class that has a destructor also has an
expli
Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 14:27 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
which is public, and should be usable.
See: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#cxx_rvalbind
I agree with you, but the C++ Standard and GCC 3.4 disagree with both of
us.
Eek.
Indeed :-)
gcc 3.x have all hono
Wrong list. Redirected.
Igor
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Jingzhao Ou wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I tried to compile a simple Tcl C extension using Cygwin gcc. I use the
> following commands:
>
> gcc -shared -ltcl -L/lib random.o
>
> I got the following error messege:
>
> random.o(.text+0x31):random.
Dear all,
I tried to compile a simple Tcl C extension using Cygwin gcc. I use the
following commands:
gcc -shared -ltcl -L/lib random.o
I got the following error messege:
random.o(.text+0x31):random.c: undefined reference to `_Tcl_WrongNumArgs'
random.o(.text+0x5e):random.c: undefined reference
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 31 15:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Aug 31 08:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:41:18AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > >On Aug 29 17:26, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > > >> http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwi
On Aug 31 15:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 31 08:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:41:18AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >On Aug 29 17:26, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > >> http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/ocaml-3.08.1-1-src.tar.bz2
> > >> http://cs.nyu.
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 14:27 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > which is public, and should be usable.
>
> See: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#cxx_rvalbind
>
> I agree with you, but the C++ Standard and GCC 3.4 disagree with both of us.
Eek.
> > gcc 3.x have all honoured th
On Aug 31 08:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:41:18AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Aug 29 17:26, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >> http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/ocaml-3.08.1-1-src.tar.bz2
> >> http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/ocaml-3.08.1-1.tar.bz2
>
Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 08:54 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
So we have code like that at the moment?
Certainly. 4 occurrences in IniDBBuilderPackage.cc and 1 in
package_db.cc.
Eh? I can't find any. We have things like
setSourcePackage(PackageSpecification(name));
Yes, that's what I
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:41:18AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Aug 29 17:26, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/ocaml-3.08.1-1-src.tar.bz2
>> http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/ocaml-3.08.1-1.tar.bz2
>> http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/setup.hi
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Did you, by chance, use "wget -o"? That would put the headers into the
file. FWIW, I just tried this[*] with Firefox 0.9.3 -- no problems.
Igor
[*] By "this" I mean "download
http://cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.431.tar.bz2";
No, just Firefox 0.9. Today, for th
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 06:17 -0400, Doctor Bill wrote:
> Actually, this makes perfect sense. When you do SomeClass(), without
> using the new operator, you are telling the compiler to create this
> instance on the stack, and then when you do foo(SomeClass()) you are
> telling the compiler to pass
> I can't see why setup's PackageSpecification class has a private
> copy-constructor.
> Am I missing something?
>
> The reason why I am suddenly interested is that the C++ standard says that
> this:
>
> foo(SomeClass())
>
> requires SomeClass's copy-constructor to be accessible (bizarre, no?) a
On Aug 29 17:26, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/ocaml-3.08.1-1-src.tar.bz2
> http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/ocaml-3.08.1-1.tar.bz2
> http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/setup.hint (also inline below)
Uploaded.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinsch
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 08:54 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > So we have code like that at the moment?
>
> Certainly. 4 occurrences in IniDBBuilderPackage.cc and 1 in package_db.cc.
Eh? I can't find any. We have things like
setSourcePackage(PackageSpecification(name));
which at the end of the call
Robert Collins wrote:
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 18:33 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
I can't see why setup's PackageSpecification class has a private
copy-constructor.
Am I missing something?
erm. to only allow the class itself to create copies.
Yes, but why was it decided to make that restriction? Either I
18 matches
Mail list logo
