Re: setup size prefs

2004-11-04 Thread Brian Dessent
"Gary R. Van Sickle" wrote: > > (In a *.txt file, please. I'd love if it was styled as *.ini) > > This creates a nice possibility to supply setup w defaults of > > your own. > > Mhmhmhhhmhhmmm The real Windows way of doing this is by putting all > such settings in the registry, in the ap

RE: setup size prefs

2004-11-04 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
[snip] > > What else do we want to remember? > > The state of the two checkboxes at the end? What else? > > IMO; If it is variable, remember and prompt with last value used. > > ..and please, if it isn't that much work: > use argv[0] as base for the pathname where you store these values. Not a

RE: setup size prefs

2004-11-04 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm just implementing better setup resizability, in particular > remembering previous window states (size + pos) as requested. > And the bugfix to resize smaller than the default size from the > ressource. > > Which window sizes do we want to store? > I started with one

Re: setup size prefs

2004-11-04 Thread Max Bowsher
Reini Urban wrote: I'm just implementing better setup resizability, in particular remembering previous window states (size + pos) as requested. And the bugfix to resize smaller than the default size from the ressource. Which window sizes do we want to store? I started with one size for all, then I

Re: CMake 2.0.5-1 ready

2004-11-04 Thread William A. Hoffman
At 12:55 PM 11/4/2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: >Don't wait for this to be on mirrors before making your announcement. >Just send an announcement after it has been verified that the software >has been uploaded, or if you want to be mildly paranoid wait for it to >show up in the package list. > >I

Re: CMake 2.0.5-1 ready

2004-11-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:46:41PM -0500, William A. Hoffman wrote: >At 12:23 PM 10/29/2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Ok. But 1.8.3 hasn't been offered via setup for a while now, AFAICT. >> >>FWIW, your setup.hint would have caused there to be only one current >>version and no previous version

Re: CMake 2.0.5-1 ready

2004-11-04 Thread William A. Hoffman
At 12:23 PM 10/29/2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: >Ok. But 1.8.3 hasn't been offered via setup for a while now, AFAICT. > >FWIW, your setup.hint would have caused there to be only one current version and no >previous version since once you specify one thing like (curr, prev, or test) you >have to