Re: Update: perl-Win32-GUI, perl-libwin32

2005-04-19 Thread Reini Urban
Corinna Vinschen schrieb: On Apr 18 21:36, Reini Urban wrote: What about perl-Win32-GUI? I didn't realize that there was another package to upload due to your unnecessary long email (g!). Now, if you resend the links together with a so far missing setup.hint file?

Re: Update: perl-Win32-GUI, perl-libwin32

2005-04-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 19 08:11, Reini Urban wrote: http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/perl-Win32-GUI/perl-Win32-GUI-1.0-2.tar.bz2 http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/perl-Win32-GUI/perl-Win32-GUI-1.0-2-src.tar.bz2

Re: Please upload: doxygen v1.4.2-20050410 (3nd take)

2005-04-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Is that ready to upload now? Corinna On Apr 15 16:51, Hans W. Horn wrote: Max, Max Bowsher wrote: Hans W. Horn wrote: I've uploaded another cut of doxygen v142 src binary packages to http://www.smithii.com/files/cygwin/hans/, addressing more concerns/suggestions raised by Max Bowsher.

Re: Please upload: doxygen v1.4.2-20050410 (3nd take)

2005-04-19 Thread Max Bowsher
Corinna Vinschen wrote: Is that ready to upload now? No. I'll reply to Hans' last mail with detail. Max.

Re: Please upload: doxygen v1.4.2-20050410 (3nd take)

2005-04-19 Thread Max Bowsher
Hans W. Horn wrote: Max, Max Bowsher wrote: Package naming still incorrect. It should be: doxygen-1.4.2_20050410-1.tar.bz2 doxygen-1.4.2_20050410-1-src.tar.bz2 Fixed. No, still wrong. You didn't read what I said carefully enough. You *need* to understand: Filenames are expected to be EXACTLY:

Package making guidelines question

2005-04-19 Thread Max Bowsher
When a packager follows a pseudo-Method 2 approach, using a home-grown script not based on generic-build-script, how closely must the naming and behaviour of the script follow the official template? What degree of automation is required in terms of setup? Do we require that the included script

Request for pkg-config update

2005-04-19 Thread Max Bowsher
Pkg-config maintainer, please could we have an update? Current is 0.17.2, Cygwin package is 0.15.0. The new release fixes some minor syntax glitches in pkg.m4, which the current autoconf package warns about loudly. Thanks, Max.

Which package is required to build LexYacc in cygwin [gcc -ll]

2005-04-19 Thread Krisakorn Rerkrai
Hi all, I tried to make my parser under Cygwin environment. It works well under the Linux but I have to do it also in Cygwin. It cannot find gcc -ll command: This is my result: gcc l.uql.c y.uql.c -o uql -ll /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.1/../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld: cannot

Re: Which package is required to build LexYacc in cygwin [gcc -ll]

2005-04-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 19 13:51, Krisakorn Rerkrai wrote: Hi all, I tried to make my parser under Cygwin environment. It works well under the Linux but I have to do it also in Cygwin. It cannot find gcc -ll command: This is my result: gcc l.uql.c y.uql.c -o uql -ll

RE: Vital information for anyone debugging setup.exe

2005-04-19 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message From: Reini Urban Sent: 18 April 2005 20:14 Dave Korn schrieb: NO! NO!!! NOOOo !!1!!! FOR GOD'S SAKE WHATEVER YOU DO DON'T USE INSIGHT ONLY EVER USE COMMAND-LINE GDB AAARRRGRGH MY EYES HA! Do you know how

Re: Package making guidelines question

2005-04-19 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Max Bowsher wrote: When a packager follows a pseudo-Method 2 approach, using a home-grown script not based on generic-build-script, how closely must the naming and behaviour of the script follow the official template? I don't think there is a particular set of

ANNOUNCEMENT NEEDED! (was Re: Please upload: Apache-1.3.33-1)

2005-04-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:23:40PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote: Hi all, please upload a new Apache-1.3.33 package available here: http://www.fast4ward.de/cygwin/release/apache/apache-1.3.33-1-src.tar.bz2 http://www.fast4ward.de/cygwin/release/apache/apache-1.3.33-1.tar.bz2

Please upload: doxygen-1.4.2_20050410-1 (n'th take)

2005-04-19 Thread Hans W. Horn
Alright, Max Bowsher wrote: No, still wrong. You didn't read what I said carefully enough. You *need* to understand: Filenames are expected to be EXACTLY: NAME-VERSION-RELEASE.tar.bz2 NAME-VERSION-RELEASE-src.tar.bz2 I guess I never appreciated the subtle naming convention used for cygwin

Re: Please upload: doxygen-1.4.2_20050410-1 (n'th take)

2005-04-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:30:12AM -0700, Hans W. Horn wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: No, still wrong. You didn't read what I said carefully enough. You *need* to understand: Filenames are expected to be EXACTLY: NAME-VERSION-RELEASE.tar.bz2 NAME-VERSION-RELEASE-src.tar.bz2 I guess I never

Re: Please upload: doxygen-1.4.2_20050410-1 (n'th take)

2005-04-19 Thread Hans W. Horn
It's only subtle, until you've digested that in this notation RELEASE is a cygwin version attribute and VERSION is an upstream version attribute (which on its own may already use a similar naming convention, such as doxygen-1.4.2-20050410). Confused the hell out of me! H. Christopher Faylor

Re: Please upload: doxygen-1.4.2_20050410-1 (n'th take)

2005-04-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:42:04AM -0700, Hans W. Horn wrote: It's only subtle, until you've digested that in this notation RELEASE is a cygwin version attribute and VERSION is an upstream version attribute (which on its own may already use a similar naming convention, such as

RE: Vital information for anyone debugging setup.exe

2005-04-19 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
[snip] Nevertheless I still prefer insight over gdb. You just have to turn off those misdirected dialog popups, which should be logfile entries. Yes, I kind of deduced that do you know what the syntax is to turn them off, by any chance? I think he's talking about doing a

RE: Vital information for anyone debugging setup.exe

2005-04-19 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message From: Gary R. Van Sickle Sent: 19 April 2005 19:05 [snip] Nevertheless I still prefer insight over gdb. You just have to turn off those misdirected dialog popups, which should be logfile entries. Yes, I kind of deduced that do you know what the syntax is

Re: Request for pkg-config update

2005-04-19 Thread Charles Wilson
Max Bowsher wrote: Pkg-config maintainer, please could we have an update? Current is 0.17.2, Cygwin package is 0.15.0. Thanks. Development seemed stalled for so long I thought it was dead. I'll roll an update out soon. -- Chuck

Re: Vital information for anyone debugging setup.exe

2005-04-19 Thread Brian Dessent
Dave Korn wrote: It would probably be easier simpler and quicker to find the messagebox call in the insight source (most of which is just tcl/tk scripting after all) and comment it out. Perhaps you missed my other reply: Heh, you noticed that too... I googled for a way to disable the