Re: tetex postinstall suggestion

2005-05-08 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Max Bowsher writes: In this way, there will be some visible indication in setup.exe that progress is occurring. I see what you mean, but that's quite a hack. What about having setup display some progress indication based on the amount of console output that is printed? Jan. -- Jan

Re: Gentle ping for Berkeley DB 4.3 package.

2005-05-08 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Max Bowsher wrote: I'm not in any hurry for it, but it would be great if there could be a db4.3 package at some point in the next couple of months or so. Thanks! Thank you for pinging me, I'll try to get it out asap. Gerrit -- =^..^=

Re: tetex postinstall suggestion

2005-05-08 Thread Max Bowsher
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Max Bowsher writes: In this way, there will be some visible indication in setup.exe that progress is occurring. I see what you mean, but that's quite a hack. What about having setup display some progress indication based on the amount of console output that is printed?

Re: tetex postinstall suggestion

2005-05-08 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sun, 8 May 2005, Max Bowsher wrote: Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Max Bowsher writes: In this way, there will be some visible indication in setup.exe that progress is occurring. I see what you mean, but that's quite a hack. What about having setup display some progress indication

Re: please test new setup

2005-05-08 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
On 5/7/05, Brian Dessent wrote: I'm thinking perhaps something along the lines: Copyright 2000, 2001 Red Hat Inc.\r\nCopyright 2001-2005 Various contributors What I did with http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html was just put the date with no name. Perhaps there could be some linked

Re: Setup - Hiding ZZZRemovedPackages?

2005-05-08 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:13:56PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: Harold L Hunt II wrote: Would it be possible to hide the ZZZRemovedPackages category when in Category view, without changing the dependency logic regarding this category? Yes, in fact I've been meaning to bring this up. In

Re: Setup - Hiding ZZZRemovedPackages?

2005-05-08 Thread Brian Dessent
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: IMO it's less visual clutter just to show the category than to add a checkbox. Automatically unhide it if the user has anything other than the current version of any of the packages? The problem with that is: - The 'category' columns are made artifically

Re: Setup - Hiding ZZZRemovedPackages?

2005-05-08 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 06:37:07PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: IMO it's less visual clutter just to show the category than to add a checkbox. Automatically unhide it if the user has anything other than the current version of any of the packages? The problem with