Dave Korn wrote:
> I rest my case that we should do at least something to mitigate the
> dependencies issue on the release branch. Well, that is to say, we should
> if we're going to release from that branch before the dependency work is
> completed and back-ported, anyway.
Yes, I agree that w
At Wednesday, May 11, 2005 3:44 PM, Tacvek wrote:
> Do note that those comments were jopshua's amd not mine. Damn Outlook
> Express constantly fails to listen to my request that email be edited
> in text mode, so it is very easy to accidentally leave originaltext
> unquoted by '>'.
See
http://www.
I rest my case that we should do at least something to mitigate the
dependencies issue on the release branch. Well, that is to say, we should
if we're going to release from that branch before the dependency work is
completed and back-ported, anyway.
Do note that those comments were jopshua's amd
Original Message
>From: Tacvek
>Sent: 11 May 2005 00:21
> I just used it to upgrade from cygwin-1.5.15-1 and it mostly worked fine.
> I definitely think the improvements are a step up from the current, thanks
> for moving on this. The only problem was that I got the cygwin1.dll "not
> fou
On May 11 10:13, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> cd xemacs/xemacs-sumo
> # wget
> http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/xemacs/xemacs-sumo/setup.hint
> wget
> http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/xemacs/xemacs-sumo/xemacs-sumo-2005-05-05-1-src.tar.bz2
> wget
> h
Hi
Please upload at your earliest convinience
cut here
#!/bin/bash
mkdir -p xemacs/xemacs-sumo xemacs/xemacs-mule-sumo
cd xemacs/xemacs-sumo
# wget
http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/xemacs/xemacs-sum
