Igor Pechtchanski writes:
Does tetex-x11 intentionally depend on XFree86-base?
That's a bug.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
$ cd setup ./bootstrap.sh
/usr/share/aclocal/freetype2.m4:7: warning: underquoted definition of
AC_CHECK_FT2 run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
or see
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
As promised earlier, here's a patch against the current CVS that adds the
Size column to the setup chooser screen, showing the size of the package
tarball(s). It seems to work well for me. Two caveats: since the size
information is extracted from setup.ini, if a
Brian Dessent wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
This doesn't work for me anymore when called with -5 parameter.
I have W2K Prof.
That was a change of Max's. The --no-md5 / -5 option is gone
completely, as is the functionality it was meant to inhibit. There is
no more pre-checking of md5s for
Brian Dessent wrote:
Chris January wrote:
I don't think the radio buttons should really be radio buttons at all
because when you select one it changes the state of another widget:
namely the package selection widget. It also collapses the tree if you
have it expanded, which is another no-no.
I've made a pass through all ChangeLog entries since the previous release,
and summarized the user-visible points into the CHANGES file.
Brian, could you take a look and tweak it if you think appropriate?
I think the setup that we currently have is undeniably better than the
current release
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
As promised earlier, here's a patch against the current CVS that adds the
Size column to the setup chooser screen, showing the size of the package
tarball(s). It seems to work well for me. Two caveats: since the size
Original Message
From: Igor Pechtchanski
Sent: 24 May 2005 04:15
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
cvs update: move away setup/cfgaux/.direxists; it is in the way
C setup/cfgaux/.direxists
$ # that last one looks kinda weird, but probably unrelated
Here's a new iteration of this patch. It incorporates Max's review and
adds comments in the size computation logic.
The size is now computed as follows: if the binary or the source package
is selected, the total size of the selected packages is used. Otherwise,
the size of the binary package is
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Dave Korn wrote:
Original Message
From: Igor Pechtchanski
Sent: 24 May 2005 04:15
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
cvs update: move away setup/cfgaux/.direxists; it is in the way
C setup/cfgaux/.direxists
$ # that last
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:12:33PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
I've wondered sometimes if perhaps source handling should be removed
entirely from the main package picker.
I think it would be a good idea to move it to another screen or even
to provide a URL and let the user download it manually.
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Since cygserver exists for quite some time now, I'm wondering why the ddd
package still references cygipc.
I'd like to ask the ddd maintainer to come up with a new package which just
uses the cygserver IPC stuff instead of using cygipc.
yes, please.
The next step
Charles Wilson wrote:
If cygipc is removed from the mirrors (and from setup.ini), setup.exe
won't UNinstall it from some poor user's system and break their
self-compiled foo package that uses cygipc, will it?
The only way that would happen (AFAIK) is if an empty dummy cygipc
package with
Brian Dessent wrote:
If cygipc is removed from the mirrors (and from setup.ini), setup.exe
won't UNinstall it from some poor user's system and break their
self-compiled foo package that uses cygipc, will it?
The only way that would happen (AFAIK) is if an empty dummy cygipc
package with
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 05:37:47PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
If cygipc is removed from the mirrors (and from setup.ini), setup.exe
won't UNinstall it from some poor user's system and break their
self-compiled foo package that uses cygipc, will it?
The only way that
15 matches
Mail list logo
