Re: Command 'more': missing dll cygpcre.dll [Attn more maintainer]

2005-09-15 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Joshua Daniel Franklin on 9/14/2005 7:10 PM: I did that 'more' release as part of getting together some packages for a minimal but still somewhat useful Cygwin installation. I like 'less' and have never actually used 'more'. I'd

Re: Command 'more': missing dll cygpcre.dll [Attn more maintainer]

2005-09-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 07:14:13AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: According to Joshua Daniel Franklin on 9/14/2005 7:10 PM: I did that 'more' release as part of getting together some packages for a minimal but still somewhat useful Cygwin installation. I like 'less' and have never actually used 'more'.

[HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time, there's apparently a need to find out, which packages are still maintained and

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time, there's apparently a need to find

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time, there's

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Hey, On 15/09/05, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time, there's

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread André Bleau
I maintain the OpenGL package. André Bleau Please address any question about the OpenGL package to the cygwin mailing list, not to me directly. _ Gardez le contrôle grâce à la protection contre les fenêtres pop-up articulée sur

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Sam Steingold
I maintain clisp [I am willing to surrender the maintainership to anyone willing qualified.] -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k http://www.palestinefacts.org/ http://pmw.org.il/ http://truepeace.org http://www.savegushkatif.org http://www.openvotingconsortium.org/ It's

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread John Morrison
On Thu, September 15, 2005 5:45 pm, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time, there's

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Eric Blake
On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote: To reply to my own mail for equity. The below list are the packages I maintain. sharutils You just recently gave that one to me. Corinna -- Eric Blake

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 18:45 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time, there's apparently a need to find out, which packages are still maintained and which

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 15 10:24, Harold L Hunt II wrote: cppunit ddd (won't do new versions) distcc fontconfig, libfontconfig1, libfontconfig-devel (won't do new versions) fvwm (won't do new versions) GraphicsMagick, libGraphicsMagick0, libGraphicsMagick-devel ImageMagick, libImageMagick6,

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 15 17:35, Eric Blake wrote: On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote: To reply to my own mail for equity. The below list are the packages I maintain. sharutils You just recently gave that one to me. Oh yes, that slipped through. Thanks for the reminder. Corinna --

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 16 03:36, Robert Collins wrote: On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 18:45 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time, there's apparently a need to find out,

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Yaakov S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here are my packages, including approved packages waiting for upload (I hope I didn't forget anything): audiofile (libaudiofile0, libaudiofile-devel) d esound (libesound0, libesound-devel) desktop-file-utils glib (glib-devel) gnome-keyring gtk+

Re: lesstif

2005-09-15 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Brian, Brian Ford wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Brian Ford wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Harold L Hunt II wrote: [snip] That's pretty much why the lesstif package is stuck where it is: it didn't work with nedit. We must have a mis-communication here. I told you

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Max Bowsher
Corinna Vinschen wrote: So, ALL maintainers of Cygwin packages, please reply to this mail within the next six weeks, including a list of ALL packages you maintain. apache2 apache2-devel apache2-manual apr libapr0 apr-util libaprutil0 doxygen neon (soon to be renamed to neon24)

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Peter A. Castro
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time, there's apparently a need to find

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Jason Tishler
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: So, ALL maintainers of Cygwin packages, please reply to this mail within the next six weeks, including a list of ALL packages you maintain. I maintain the following packages: fetchmail postgresql (but Reini was suppose

Re: Adding a Maintainer: field to setup.hint

2005-09-15 Thread Eric Blake
I'm thinking about adding a maintainer field to setup.hint which would have meaning only in setup.hint but would allow us to more easily track who maintains what. It would look like this: Maintainer: Chris Faylor i.e., no email address, just a person's name (for obvious reasons). I

Re: Adding a Maintainer: field to setup.hint

2005-09-15 Thread Max Bowsher
Christopher Faylor wrote: I'm thinking about adding a maintainer field to setup.hint which would have meaning only in setup.hint but would allow us to more easily track who maintains what. It would look like this: Maintainer: Chris Faylor Perhaps keep maintainer all lower-case, for

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Bob Heckel
w3m * On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time,

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Bob Heckel
* On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:21:55PM -0400, Bob Heckel wrote: w3m Sorry, forgot to include: libgc

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Lapo Luchini
Corinna Vinschen wrote: So, ALL maintainers of Cygwin packages, please reply to this mail within the next six weeks, including a list of ALL packages you maintain. Package LastUpstr. - rsync 2.6.6-1 = typespeed

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lapo Luchini wrote: libungif AFAIR is should be Harold's since 4.1.0-3 But (only now) I see that he didn't include it in his list. Maybe I remember wrong. Or maybe he just forgot. Anyway, as I said 0.962 years ago¹, I no longer use it or am

libungif [Was: Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.]

2005-09-15 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Lapo, Lapo Luchini wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: [snip] libungifAFAIR is should be Harold's since 4.1.0-3 Lapo Hmm... Here is me announcing a 4.1.2-1 for your eval: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00044.html Here is a response from you about how you think

RE: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Gareth Pearce
Nano (Several unstable versions I could consider moving too but wont unless interest is expressed, also some new stable versions, I guess I should update.) Aspell binaries and docs and dev and libaspell but not dictionaries. (There is a new version of this which I will upgrade too if any

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Yaakov S
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Have I missed one? gtk-doc? If anyone is interested to take over one or more packages feel free to do so, just drop me a note in my inbox. There are also packages in my private repository which could be taken, i.e. Gnome desktop related packages are done by Yaakov and

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Sorry, I sent this earlier today, but from the wrong account so it ended up bouncing. Yaakov S wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Harold L Hunt II wrote: [...package list...] freetype? Indeed, freetype2 is somewhat out of date. I've already

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Charles Wilson
Corinna Vinschen wrote: Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time, there's apparently a need to find out, which packages

Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

2005-09-15 Thread Eric Blake
At the moment, I maintain: I suppose I also inherited some obsolete packages by taking over coreutils: bash bashdb bash-completion coreutils cvsutils diffstat fileutils (obsolete) findutils libreadline4 (unlikely to need upgrade) libreadline5 (unlikely to need upgrade) libreadline6