On Oct 7 10:54, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 03:45:21PM +0100, Lino Miguel Martins Tinoco wrote:
Hi!
I maintain ping.
Have you seen the periodic complaints from people in the cygwin mailing
list who claim to be unable to run ping? It works fine for me but there
are
On Oct 9 16:41, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
http://lilypond.org/cygwin/uploads/guile/setup.hint
http://lilypond.org/cygwin/uploads/guile/guile-1.6.7-4-src.tar.bz2
http://lilypond.org/cygwin/uploads/guile/guile-1.6.7-4.tar.bz2
===
http://lilypond.org/cygwin/uploads/guile/setup.hint
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski writes:
I feel I should clarify the statement that I'd rather not pollute the
source directory with more files. I don't care if there are extra
files in /usr/src/PKG-VER -- that's what it's there for. However, I'd
rather
On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the
other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have
a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time,
there's apparently a need to find
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 03:45:21PM +0100, Lino Miguel Martins Tinoco
wrote:
Hi!
I maintain ping.
Have you seen the periodic complaints from people in the cygwin
mailing list who claim to be unable to run ping? It works fine for
me but there are apparently
Corinna Vinschen writes:
xwinclip
Isn't this one obsolete nowadays Harold ?
compface ??? (Dr. Volker Zell)
Do you want a new package now, or should we wait if the current
maintainer shows up again ?
Ciao
Volker
Igor Pechtchanski writes:
Yes, .logs, or LOGS, or even just /usr/src/$PACKAGE[*] -- it's up to you.
As for deleting... What I normally do with source packages is run
./PKG-VER.sh prep, and then move PKG-VER.sh, PKG-VER.tar and
PKG-VER.patch to PKG-VER/CYGWIN-PATCHES. That
I am the maintainer for cmake.
cmake William A. Hoffman
-Bill
At 09:08 AM 10/10/2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the
other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we
On Oct 10 16:10, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
compface ??? (Dr. Volker Zell)
Do you want a new package now, or should we wait if the current
maintainer shows up again ?
As it suites you. You can also just wait for the end of the survey
(3 weeks left).
Corinna
--
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski writes:
Yes, .logs, or LOGS, or even just /usr/src/$PACKAGE[*] -- it's up to you.
As for deleting... What I normally do with source packages is run
./PKG-VER.sh prep, and then move PKG-VER.sh, PKG-VER.tar and
PKG-VER.patch
Igor Pechtchanski writes:
Sounds good, except can you please resubmit the diff with some context,
preferably unified, just to make sure I can apply it cleanly?
Uuups,my fault.
So again:
2005-10-10 Dr. Volker Zell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* templates/generic-build-script
The following is useful information from me... I'm giving some guidance
on decisions that need to be made, but I've long since relinquished any
responsibility to make those decisions, so just ignore my advice if you
disagree, rather than getting all uppity about how I'm not in charge and
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
@@ -340,6 +349,7 @@
cp $0.sig ${srcinstdir}/ ; \
fi \
cd ${srcinstdir} \
+ tar cvjf ${log_pkg_name} *.LOG rm *.LOG \
tar cvjf ${src_pkg} * )
}
finish() {
One small issue here: would it make sense to list the files
On Oct 10 08:28, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following is useful information from me... I'm giving some guidance
on decisions that need to be made, but I've long since relinquished any
responsibility to make those decisions, so just ignore my advice if you
disagree, rather than getting all
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following is useful information from me...
[snip]
xwinclip
I'm still listed as the maintainer of this and I declare it obsolete.
I'm not going to maintain it anymore and it doesn't need to exist
anymore, so please remove it from the
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following is useful information from me...
[snip]
xwinclip
I'm still listed as the maintainer of this and I declare it obsolete.
I'm not going to maintain it anymore and it doesn't need to exist
anymore, so please
Corinna Vinschen writes:
lilypond Jan Nieuwenhuizen
lilypond-doc Jan Nieuwenhuizen
I've done some testing and bugfixing and will announce packages after
we release 2.6.4, probably later this week.
ec-fonts-mftraced
This is a dependency for
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
lilypond Jan Nieuwenhuizen
lilypond-doc Jan Nieuwenhuizen
I've done some testing and bugfixing and will announce packages after
we release 2.6.4, probably later this week.
Please
Igor Pechtchanski writes:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
@@ -340,6 +349,7 @@
cp $0.sig ${srcinstdir}/ ; \
fi \
cd ${srcinstdir} \
+ tar cvjf ${log_pkg_name} *.LOG rm *.LOG \
tar cvjf ${src_pkg} * )
}
finish() {
One small issue
Hi all
As you all know by now, Corinna is hunting for our vacant package
maintainers. So may be it's a good idea to also have consensus about
our X11 directory structure regarding man pages and documentation.
I propose that documentation in general should go to /usr/share/doc/$PACKAGE
even for
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
I propose that documentation in general should go to /usr/share/doc/$PACKAGE
even for X11 packages and the main man page directory should be dictated
by the generic X11 tree, which is right now /usr/X11R6/man/manX (X=1,)
Any comments ?
Why do
Hi,
I would like to propose myself as the cygwin maintainer for git-core.
http://www.kernel.org/git/
This now works out of the box on cygwin, but it does not yet have a cygwin
package. I have created the patch to make it to generate cygwin install
packages, which i will be sending to the git
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Ford wrote:
Why do you propose keeping a distinct X11R6 tree yet puting documentation
outside it. I would prefer these to be consistent.
FWIW, Debian and Gentoo both do as proposed.
IIRC, Harold had decided to eliminate the X11R6 subtree
Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
What does Cygwin native mean? If Cygwin is meant to be a POSIX
environment, then X11 should be the standard for GUI apps.
Not gonna happen: it has been stated before on this list that 'insight'
*must* run without X -- which means that tk will remain Win32GUI.
James R. Phillips wrote:
Your example [not quoted] is a good one, because the libraries are libplot and
libplotter, of which libplot is C, and libplotter is C++. I guess libxmi is in
there too - I think that is C.
Can you suggest an appropriate naming/numbering scheme? Would I just append
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Wilson wrote:
Not gonna happen: it has been stated before on this list that 'insight'
*must* run without X -- which means that tk will remain Win32GUI.
Tk must remain Win32GUI, or *a* Win32GUI Tk must remain, for the sake of
insight?
It
Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
Others have mentioned building *NIX tcl/tk on Cygwin, and I wouldn't
call building gtk2 daunting;
Daunting to build it in such a way that (a) the win32 version doesn't
interfere with the X version, (b) vice versa, and (c) you're SURE that
nothing win32-runtime
27 matches
Mail list logo
