Re: Please upload: tzcode-2005r-1

> Kelley Cook writes: >> wget > http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/tzcode/setup.hint >> wget > http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/tzcode/tzcode-2005r-1-src.tar.bz2 >> wget > http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygw

is there a standard way to get the g-b-s to apply multiple patches?

I'm working on updating the fortune package and switching to use the generic build script, but I'd like to have the source package to have the original source, the current debian patches, and a separate patch file with my patches. The debian package maintainer is also the maintainer of the upstrea

Re: is there a standard way to get the g-b-s to apply multiple patches?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes on 1/11/2006 5:00 AM: > I'm working on updating the fortune package and switching to use the > generic build script, but I'd like to have the source package to have > the original source, the current debian patches,

Re: is there a standard way to get the g-b-s to apply multiple patches?

Eric Blake wrote: > Take a look at bash and readline, where I distinguish between Chet Ramey's > official upstream patches vs. my cygwin-specific patches; the > bash-3.0-14.patch contains only my differences after the upstream patches > have been applied. In particular, my modifications to g-b-s

Re: is there a standard way to get the g-b-s to apply multiple patches?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Brian Dessent on 1/11/2006 7:03 AM: > Example: > > $ ./foo-1.0-1.sh prep conf build > # decide that for some reason you want to start over > $ rm -rf foo-1.0/ > $ ./foo-1.0-1.sh prep conf build > > However, the second build will not cont

Re: is there a standard way to get the g-b-s to apply multiple patches?

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Brian Dessent on 1/11/2006 7:03 AM: > > Example: > > > > $ ./foo-1.0-1.sh prep conf build > > # decide that for some reason you want to start over > > $ rm -rf foo-1.0/ > > $ ./foo-1.0-1.sh prep conf build > > > > However, the second build will

Please Upload: fftw3-3.0.1-2

Cygwin Uploaders: Please upload fftw3-3.0.1-2 from the following locations: ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw3/fftw3-3.0.1-2-src.tar.bz2 ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw3/fftw3-3.0.1-2.tar.bz2 ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw3/fftw3-dev/fftw3-dev-3.0.1-2.tar.bz2 ftp://antiskid.homel

Re: Please Upload: fftw3-3.0.1-2

On Jan 11 07:16, James R. Phillips wrote: > ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw3/fftw3-3.0.1-2-src.tar.bz2 > ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw3/fftw3-3.0.1-2.tar.bz2 > ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw3/fftw3-dev/fftw3-dev-3.0.1-2.tar.bz2 > ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw3/fftw3-doc

Re: Please upload: tzcode-2005r-2

On Jan 11 18:34, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > cd tzcode > wget http://de.geocities.com/vzell1/cygwin/tzcode-2005r-2-src.tar.zip > wget http://de.geocities.com/vzell1/cygwin/tzcode-2005r-2.tar.zip > mv tzcode-2005r-2-src.tar.zip tzcode-2005r-2-src.tar.bz2 > mv tzcode-2005r-2.tar.zip tzcode-2005r-2.t

gpl ghostscript 8.50 released 12/31

It appears the ghostscript developers snuck in a new gpl release just before the end of the year, updating gpl ghostscript from 8.15 to 8.50: http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~ghost/doc/GPL/gpl850.htm Per the last maintainer's update from Corrina http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-apps/2005-10/msg00246.html

[ITP] Numeric-24.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Python Numeric is used by many other Python modules, including pygtk, and is included with every major Linux distribution. Once approved, AFAIK this should be uploaded under /release/python/. ftp://sunsite.dk/projects/cygwinports/release/python/Numer

Re: [ITP] updated: lighttpd-1.4.8-1 [Was: lighttpd on cygwin?]

Lapo Luchini wrote: > Does this means that it fails to load to you as it conflicts with other > DLLs? Yes, but only in certain cases and situations -- not in general. > Whose fault is it? My ld.exe? No, ld still defaults to --disable-auto-image-base. > Should I add a "rebase" in the building

Re: [ITP] updated: lighttpd-1.4.8-1 [Was: lighttpd on cygwin?]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:37:39PM -0700, Verse X wrote: > >Lapo Luchini wrote: > > > >> Does this means that it fails to load to you as it conflicts with other > >> DLLs? > > > >Yes, but only in certain cases and situations -- not in general. > > > >> Whose fault is it? My ld.exe? > > > >No, ld st

Re: [ITP] updated: lighttpd-1.4.8-1 [Was: lighttpd on cygwin?]

Sorry, my previous response was inadvertently sent before I was done. On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:37:39PM -0700, Verse X wrote: > >Lapo Luchini wrote: > > > >> Does this means that it fails to load to you as it conflicts with other > >> DLLs? > > > >Yes, but only in certain cases and situations --