Re: monotone 0.26pre1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Lapo Luchini on 1/26/2006 3:35 PM: > > I prepared 0.26pre1 version for my own experimenting. > > I'm asking for advice here: should we release them as a "test" version > and let people experiment a bit, or we better wait for 0.26 "final"

Re: [maybe-ITP] gamin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote: > Now that I have an existing patchset, then it's a different story > entirely. This does affect me as well, so let me see what I can do. > I'm building 0.1.5 with these patches now. OK, I have it built; but test result

Re: Cygwin Setup: Fatal Error: Uncaught Exception

[Moving to cygwin-apps from private e-mail] On 24 Jan 2006 at 17:11, Igor Peshansky wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Iain Alexander wrote: > [snip] > > Whether treating the package as missing is the right long-term answer is > > more complicated. > > [snip] > > Briefly, re-downloading the package m

monotone 0.26pre1

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel/5647 Monotone 0.26 will use "rosters". I'm not quite sure what they are but the essentials are: a. they are smaller than the old revision-metadata format b. they are more flexible and will permit new features c. they are totally in

Re: [maybe-ITP] gamin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lapo Luchini wrote: > I guess you did try with latest version, 0.1.7..? > Both under FreeBSD and Cygwin we didn't manage to have a working > gamin-0.1.7. > But gamin-0.1.5 works perfectly, it seems. (Using polling, of course.) Actually, neither 0.1.6

Re: maybe-ITP: bsdiff

Christopher Faylor wrote, on 2005-05-16: > On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 06:45:57PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> Also, AFAICS, that's not about distribution, but it's about linking >> against the Cygwin DLL. If you do that with an application which has >> a non-approved OSS license, you're infringi

Re: [maybe-ITP] gamin

Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote: > AFAIK it doesn't. (Otherwise I would have included it in Cygwin Ports > a while ago, or even the distro, as gnome-vfs2 can use it.) It does > compile easily, as do the python bindings, but while the server > launches, the test suite fails horribly, seemingly becau

Huh, really got donations!

Hello Fellows, I really got donations, these are the first donations I got ever ;) 16. Jan 2006: mark phoenix €5,00 EUR 24. Dez 2005: michael benndorf €5,00 EUR Many thanks to Mark Phoenix and Michael Benndorf! Gerrit -- =^..^= http://nyckelpiga.de/donate.h

Re: [UPLOAD] Base-files 3.7-1

> > Your email to cygwin-announce should have waited until you saw this email > > that your package was actually uploaded. > > Humm, sorry, that must have been a typo - I'd have sworn that I sent it to > cygwin-apps. I saw the same email in both cygwin-apps (this thread) and in the cygwin-announc

Re: [UPLOAD] Base-files 3.7-1

On Thu, January 26, 2006 1:36 pm, Eric Blake wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > According to John Morrison on 1/25/2006 1:55 PM: >> >> >> md5sum: 4000a7079f671732128e1f1be4e4147c

Re: [UPLOAD] Base-files 3.7-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to John Morrison on 1/25/2006 1:55 PM: > > > md5sum: 4000a7079f671732128e1f1be4e4147c Uploaded, and I removed 3.4-2 and 3.5-1. You might want to

Re: [maybe-ITP] gamin

I hereby forward the answer of the friend of mine, that is not subscribed here. I also add that probably http://tinyurl.com/c27fn or the cited "change journals" is the way to go. = Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>This really works on cygwin? It seems so, why