Igor Peshansky wrote:
> Umm, VMware? Or is it a disk space issue?
No (recent) VMware for FreeBSD unfortunately, I'll take a look at qemu...
Anyway, this evening I gave a stab at lighttpd and it now compiles
correctly, I only have to test it a bit better and it should be ready
for release.
--
L
Steffen Sledz wrote:
> 1. What's the best way to find all the dependency information needed for
> hint files if multiple binary packages (with own hint files) are made
> from the same source? Calling cygport with the deps parameter does not
> split the dependencies to different packages.
By runn
Hi,
Corinna Vinschen, le Wed 06 Jun 2007 12:26:54 +0200, a écrit :
> - There's an executable xbrlapi.exe in the package which depends on X.
>
> - cygbrlapi-0.5.dll depends on WS2_32.DLL.
These are fixed in version 3.8-2 of the brltty package in
http://brl.thefreecat.org/brltty/cygwin/
I also mo
I've updated the lftp package for a new upstream release. Please upload.
Thanks, Andrew.
wget \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/lftp/lftp-3.5.11-1.tar.bz2 \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/lftp/lftp-3.5.11-1-src.tar.bz2
On Jul 3 18:43, Dave Korn wrote:
> BTW, I just noticed the link to the OSI site is 404. It could be that it's
> one of those sites that just don't work if you disable scripts and cookies,
> but it's more likely the link is just out-of-date.
Fixed.
Thanks for the hint,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vi
On 03 July 2007 08:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
And there I was trying to TITTLL the thread.
Oh well, anyone for hippos? ;-)
BTW, I just noticed the link to the OSI site is 404. It could be that it's
one of those sites that just don't work if you disable scripts and cookies,
but it's
My work at the new emacs packages makes good progress. The cygport stuff
is really comfortable. I hope, that I can present a new version in the
next days for testing.
But also after reading all the documentation there are some last
questions (if I've overlooked something please forgive me):
1. Wh
On Jul 2 15:09, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > There are no short-term plans to change the license of Cygwin, rather we
> > just wait until the OSI certifies the GPLv3 as open source license
> > according to the definitions. As Brian already noted, as soon as the
> > O
