Eric Blake schrieb:
Currently, emacs and emacs-X11 both provide /usr/bin/emacs.exe. Which
means whichever package is installed last wins. I would much rather that
you used the 'alternatives' package, and instead of directly providing
/usr/bin/emacs.exe, instead provide two differently-named
Reini Urban schrieb:
Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
On Jul 2 19:06, Reini Urban wrote:
Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
- Your package pollutes the /usr/bin directory with two versions of
*almost* every tool in the perl package, foo, foo5.8.8, bar, bar5.8.8,
etc. The former 5.8.7 package only created
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Blake schrieb:
Why did the package grow from 8meg to 17meg? Not necessarily a problem,
if there is a good reason for it, but it seems a bit odd.
The emacs.exe binary itself is about 15MB (stripped). ;-)
Why did the package shrink from
hints unchanged
http://rurban.xarch.at/software/cygwin/release/clamav/clamav-0.91-1.tar.bz2
http://rurban.xarch.at/software/cygwin/release/clamav/clamav-0.91-1-src.tar.bz2
http://rurban.xarch.at/software/cygwin/release/clamav/libclamav2/libclamav2-0.91-1.tar.bz2
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 11:22:24PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
hints unchanged
http://rurban.xarch.at/software/cygwin/release/clamav/clamav-0.91-1.tar.bz2
http://rurban.xarch.at/software/cygwin/release/clamav/clamav-0.91-1-src.tar.bz2