Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-08-01 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Lapo Luchini on 8/1/2007 11:25 AM: > Lapo Luchini wrote: >> It does indeed need libiconv and libintl, but it currently links them >> statically. >> I'll investigate that a bit further and either convince it to use the >> shared ones or cor

Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-08-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 1 20:56, Lapo Luchini wrote: > http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/pinfo/pinfo-0.6.9-1-src.tar.bz2 > http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/pinfo/pinfo-0.6.9-1.tar.bz2 > http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/pinfo/setup.hint Uploaded. Thanks for taking over maintainership. Igor? It's that time of year again. C

Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-08-01 Thread Lapo Luchini
Christopher Faylor wrote: > I'd say this is actually your call. If you are ok with linking them > statically, I see no reason why you shouldn't do so. > Then I'd say to upload it: the worst it can do is occupy slightly more space on disk. (and I'll have more time to try harder to have next rel

Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-08-01 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:25:20PM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote: >Lapo Luchini wrote: >> It does indeed need libiconv and libintl, but it currently links them >> statically. >> I'll investigate that a bit further and either convince it to use the >> shared ones or correct the setup.hint. >> >OK, I

Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-08-01 Thread Lapo Luchini
Lapo Luchini wrote: > It does indeed need libiconv and libintl, but it currently links them > statically. > I'll investigate that a bit further and either convince it to use the > shared ones or correct the setup.hint. > OK, I failed to convince it so far. Given the fact that 5-25 August I will