So is it a GTG then? Can I proceed and announce it on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best regards,
Gergely Budai
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:06:09 +0100
> Von: Peter Rosin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
> Betreff: Re: [ITP] robodoc 4.99.34
> According to
On 04 February 2008 14:10, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24196
>
> I see...
>
>> The fix is almost - but not quite - equivalent to applying the
>> "--enable-fully-dynamic-string" configure option, but hopefully has the
>> advantage of being ABI-compatible.
>
>> As a bit of
Dave Korn writes:
Hi Dave,
> There is a cygwin-local fix in 3.4.4-3 that is essential for correctness
> when throwing exceptions or passing std::string objects across DLL boundaries.
> This is a bug in upstream gcc: see
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24196
I see...
> The fix is almost - but not
Dear All,
as it is my first tentative to adopt a package
I hope to have understood cleary the rules
:-o
I ported Octave to cygport build and simplified
the packages to just octave and octave-devel.
Previous split was:
octave
octave-headers
octave-htmldoc
octave-doc
octave-info
No intention
On Feb 4 09:00, Gergely Budai wrote:
> So is it a GTG then? Can I proceed and announce it...
It was a GTG, but you should only proceed and announce it when
somebody confirmed that it has been actually uploaded ;)
Well, here we go: Uploaded. Please announce.
Next time, could you please paste t
