So is it a GTG then? Can I proceed and announce it on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best regards,
Gergely Budai
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:06:09 +0100
Von: Peter Rosin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Betreff: Re: [ITP] robodoc 4.99.34
According to the
On 04 February 2008 14:10, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24196
I see...
The fix is almost - but not quite - equivalent to applying the
--enable-fully-dynamic-string configure option, but hopefully has the
advantage of being ABI-compatible.
As a bit of generic advice
Dave Korn writes:
Hi Dave,
There is a cygwin-local fix in 3.4.4-3 that is essential for correctness
when throwing exceptions or passing std::string objects across DLL boundaries.
This is a bug in upstream gcc: see
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24196
I see...
The fix is almost - but not quite
Dear All,
as it is my first tentative to adopt a package
I hope to have understood cleary the rules
:-o
I ported Octave to cygport build and simplified
the packages to just octave and octave-devel.
Previous split was:
octave
octave-headers
octave-htmldoc
octave-doc
octave-info
No
On Feb 4 09:00, Gergely Budai wrote:
So is it a GTG then? Can I proceed and announce it...
It was a GTG, but you should only proceed and announce it when
somebody confirmed that it has been actually uploaded ;)
Well, here we go: Uploaded. Please announce.
Next time, could you please paste
