On Feb 15 20:26, Jari Aalto wrote:
http://cygwin.cante.net/sgrep/setup.hint \
http://cygwin.cante.net/sgrep/sgrep-1.94a-1-src.tar.bz2 \
http://cygwin.cante.net/sgrep/sgrep-1.94a-1.tar.bz2
Uploaded.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails
On Feb 16 16:33, Jari Aalto wrote:
http://cygwin.cante.net/zoo/zoo-2.10-1-src.tar.bz2 \
http://cygwin.cante.net/zoo/zoo-2.10-1.tar.bz2 \
http://cygwin.cante.net/zoo/setup.hint
Uploaded.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
On Feb 17 01:25, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
| last conflicts with last from sysvinit-2.84-4
This makes sense, but removing it from util-linux will require a
simultaneous rename of -4 to -5, otherwise /usr/bin/last will go missing
entirely.
sysvinit has no
On Feb 18 03:16, Jari Aalto wrote:
http://cygwin.cante.net/lzma/setup.hint \
http://cygwin.cante.net/lzma/lzma-4.43-2-src.tar.bz2 \
http://cygwin.cante.net/lzma/lzma-4.43-2.tar.bz2
Uploaded.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding
On Feb 18 09:31, Jari Aalto wrote:
http://cygwin.cante.net/wput/setup.hint \
http://cygwin.cante.net/wput/wput-0.6.1-2-src.tar.bz2 \
http://cygwin.cante.net/wput/wput-0.6.1-2.tar.bz2
Uploaded.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding
Corinna Vinschen writes:
On Feb 17 01:25, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
| last conflicts with last from sysvinit-2.84-4
This makes sense, but removing it from util-linux will require a
simultaneous rename of -4 to -5, otherwise
On Feb 18 14:14, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
sysvinit has no maintainer for ages. We should just pull it from the
distro if we don't find a maintainer this week. We can replace it with
an empty package which has util-linux as dependency.
I like to take
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:25:30AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
* Sun 2008-02-17 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:04:19PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
Would the package's maintainer ugrade to 2.5.9. The current does not
handle correctly
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:30:32AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
* Sun 2008-02-17 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 03:16:45AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
|Eric Blake; Cygwin user list:
| Please update Automake to the latest version with LZMA
Christopher Faylor wrote:
So, to reiterate: cygwin-apps is not a bug-reporting mailing list and,
if you are a package maintainer, you should be monitoring the cygwin
mailing list.
Request for clarification:
When is a problem a packaging issue and when is it a bug report?
- Problems with
On 18 February 2008 06:26, Jari Aalto wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:04:19PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
Would the package's maintainer ugrade to 2.5.9. The current does not
handle correctly patches/files that use CRLF line endings. Trying to
apply CRLR patch to CRLF file fails (bug in
* Mon 2008-02-18 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:25:30AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
Would the package's maintainer ugrade to 2.5.9. The current does not
handle correctly patches/files that use CRLF line endings.
The original source
On 18 February 2008 18:08, Jari Aalto wrote:
We could consider better and more organized method of reporting
issues.
A dedicated bugs list could be welcoming idea. The message could be
CC'd to the package maintainer as well if he so wishes. Not all may
want that but some may want to get
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:08:03PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
* Mon 2008-02-18 Christopher Faylor X
* Message-Id: XX
Please don't include something that looks like a mail address in
the text of your responses.
So, to reiterate: cygwin-apps is not a
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 06:26:43PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
On 18 February 2008 18:08, Jari Aalto wrote:
We could consider better and more organized method of reporting issues.
A dedicated bugs list could be welcoming idea. The message could be
CC'd to the package maintainer as well if he so
On 18 February 2008 18:43, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I went to the effort of setting up bugzilla for cygwin quite a while
ago. I volunteered to have it set it up but I didn't want to be
bothered with maintaining it on a daily basis, weeding out all of the
clueless bug reports, and responding
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 07:04:21PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
Is there any way to completely delete a bug and all traces of it from
the db *without* mailing the original poster (and preferably less
drastic thatn using a command-line SQL client on src)? It would be
nice to delete #5249, #5319, #5353,
On 18 February 2008 18:45, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 06:26:43PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
On 18 February 2008 18:08, Jari Aalto wrote:
We could consider better and more organized method of reporting issues.
A dedicated bugs list could be welcoming idea. The message
18 matches
Mail list logo
