Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-05-01 Thread Max Bowsher
Warren Young wrote: > Then other > package maintainers can rebuild for libexpat1 at their leisure. Unless, > that is, it's a big deal to port to expat 2? I believe it's merely a matter of rebuilding. Max. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [ITA] doxygen-1.5.5-1

2008-05-01 Thread Max Bowsher
Warren Young wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: >> requires: cygwin libpng12 >> >> The requires: line looks wrong to meWhy libpng? > > Ask Max. :) Last time I looked there was a copy of libpng embedded in the doxygen source tree. Building another copy seemed rather dumb when it's in the distro as a

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-05-01 Thread Charles Wilson
Warren Young wrote: Brian Dessent wrote: Otherwise, you potentially violate the GPL licensing requirement to provide the source as it would disappear from the mirrors entirely as new 'foo' versions pushed the old one off. So what I need to do, then, is rebuild the 1.95.8 package so it _only_

Re: [ITA] doxygen-1.5.5-1

2008-05-01 Thread Warren Young
Dave Korn wrote: requires: cygwin libpng12 The requires: line looks wrong to meWhy libpng? Ask Max. :) It may have had to do with a historical ability to use graphviz/dot or something like that. Max's latest doesn't do this, nor does mine, because I can't get graphviz to build cleanl

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-05-01 Thread Brian Dessent
Warren Young wrote: > > Otherwise, you potentially violate the GPL licensing requirement to > > provide the source as it would disappear from the mirrors entirely as > > new 'foo' versions pushed the old one off. > > So what I need to do, then, is rebuild the 1.95.8 package so it _only_ > builds

RE: [ITA] doxygen-1.5.5-1

2008-05-01 Thread Dave Korn
Warren Young wrote on 01 May 2008 23:15: > Taking over maintainership of this package from Max Bowsher. Ported > build from g-b-s to cygport and updated from 1.5.1 to 1.5.5, so I'd like > at least one GTG before I post the RFU message. > > http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/doxygen/setup.hint sdesc: "A

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-05-01 Thread Warren Young
Brian Dessent wrote: Otherwise, you potentially violate the GPL licensing requirement to provide the source as it would disappear from the mirrors entirely as new 'foo' versions pushed the old one off. So what I need to do, then, is rebuild the 1.95.8 package so it _only_ builds the DLL packag

[ITA] sqlite-3.5.6-2

2008-05-01 Thread Warren Young
Taking over maintainership of this package from Max Bowsher. Ported build from g-b-s to cygport and updated from 3.5.1 to 3.5.6, so I'd like at least one GTG before I post the RFU message. The -2 on the package name is because this is pretty similar to Yaakov's cygwin-ports version, which is

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-05-01 Thread Brian Dessent
Warren Young wrote: > Yes, but the package name changed, so I think all I have to do is ensure > the RFU request says to leave libexpat0 alone, right? Then other > package maintainers can rebuild for libexpat1 at their leisure. Unless, > that is, it's a big deal to port to expat 2? There's more

[ITA] expat-2.0.1-1

2008-05-01 Thread Warren Young
Taking over maintainership of this package from Max Bowsher. Ported from g-b-s to cygport and updated from 1.95.8 to 2.0.1, so I'd like at least one GTG before I post the RFU message. Also, we need a ruling on what to do with the existing expat 1.x stuff. It seems there's an ABI difference b

[ITA] doxygen-1.5.5-1

2008-05-01 Thread Warren Young
Taking over maintainership of this package from Max Bowsher. Ported build from g-b-s to cygport and updated from 1.5.1 to 1.5.5, so I'd like at least one GTG before I post the RFU message. http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/doxygen/setup.hint http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/doxygen/doxygen-1.5.5-1.tar.bz2 ht

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-05-01 Thread Warren Young
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: For those that may be interested in adoption, there are updated versions of some of these now in Ports: Okay, thanks for the leg up. I'm guessing you'll keep maintaining these packages? I started my versions from yours, but had to remove several features becaus

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-05-01 Thread Warren Young
Max Bowsher wrote: It's a most bizarre and quirky buildsystem that I've never seen any other package use. Yeah, and it seems to require a little more handholding in 1.5.5. * expat I can do this one, but I'm concerned because expat.sf.net isn't responding right now. Did expat die again whi

Re: [RFU] atool-0.34.0-2

2008-05-01 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 11:50:50AM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: >> On Apr 29 12:07, Andrew Schulman wrote: >> > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/atool/atool-0.34.0-2.tar.bz2 \ >> > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/atool/atool-0.34.0-2-src.tar.bz2 >> >> Uploaded. > >This is on the mi

Re: [RFU] atool-0.34.0-2

2008-05-01 Thread Andrew Schulman
> On Apr 29 12:07, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/atool/atool-0.34.0-2.tar.bz2 \ > > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/atool/atool-0.34.0-2-src.tar.bz2 > > Uploaded. This is on the mirrors, but it hasn't shown up yet in Setup. I see that there are three