Christopher Faylor wrote on 09 September 2008 19:59:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:01:31PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> Christopher Faylor wrote on 09 September 2008 18:51:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 06:45:51PM +0100, Dave Korn
... I noticed this.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today
htdocs-setup-patch.diff
Description: Binary data
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:00:53AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> I thought the next version of gcc was not going to perpetuate the
>>> -mno-cygwin madness. I'd really prefer not releasing a version with
>>> this option even if it
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:57:54AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:00:53AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I thought the next version of gcc was not going to perpetuate the
-mno-cygwin madness. I
Christopher Faylor wrote on 10 September 2008 15:06:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:57:54AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:00:53AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I thought the next version of gcc
