On Feb 12 15:48, Steffen Sledz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
> > can you do me a favor? Can you have a look into the FAQ entries "Is
> > there a Cygwin port of GNU Emacs?" and the next one "What about NT
> > Emacs?" and suggest a rewrite? The information given in these two FAQ
> > entries is
Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
> can you do me a favor? Can you have a look into the FAQ entries "Is
> there a Cygwin port of GNU Emacs?" and the next one "What about NT
> Emacs?" and suggest a rewrite? The information given in these two FAQ
> entries is certainly outdated, but I'm not quite sure how t
On Feb 12 15:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Hi Volker,
>
> can you do me a favor? Can you have a look into the FAQ entries "Is
> there a Cygwin port of GNU Emacs?" and the next one "What about NT
> Emacs?" and suggest a rewrite?
Urgh, there's a third one right afterwards called "What about XEmacs
Hi Volker,
can you do me a favor? Can you have a look into the FAQ entries "Is
there a Cygwin port of GNU Emacs?" and the next one "What about NT
Emacs?" and suggest a rewrite? The information given in these two FAQ
entries is certainly outdated, but I'm not quite sure how to rephrase
them. What
On Feb 12 14:26, Dave Korn wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > can you please have a look into the FAQ in the Cygwin sources, file
> > faq-programming.xml? The question "How do I compile a Win32 executable
> > that doesn't use Cygwin?" needs a revamp for Cygwin 1.7 but I don't know
> > the cor
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> can you please have a look into the FAQ in the Cygwin sources, file
> faq-programming.xml? The question "How do I compile a Win32 executable
> that doesn't use Cygwin?" needs a revamp for Cygwin 1.7 but I don't know
> the correct answer to this question. At one point we
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:32:27PM -0500, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>>> At one point we will get a mingw cross compiler, right? wrong?
>> I'd appreciate having once since I use Cygwin to produce my MinGW
>> packages.
>
> I'm willing to provide this package but I think Dav
On Feb 11 12:08, Warren Young wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
What "entanglement problem"?
>>> This one: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-01/msg00648.html
>>
>> Well, that's not such a big issue, is it? As long as upgrading works
>> fine...
>
> It may be enough that the problem and t
