Re: [ITA][1.7] GraphicsMagick-1.3.5-2

my fault writing. :-(( the full setting of Yaakov was failing all test. This version pass almost all the test. Regards Marco --- Gio 2/4/09, Charles Wilson ha scritto: Da: Charles Wilson cyg...@cwilson.fastmail.fm Oggetto: Re: [ITA][1.7] GraphicsMagick-1.3.5-2 A: CygWin-Apps Data:

Re: [RFU 1.7] rdiff-backup 1.2.8-3 -- incremental backup/mirror

On Apr 1 11:31, David Rothenberger wrote: wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ http://mysite.verizon.net/res00a7j/cygwin-1.7/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup-1.2.8-3-src.tar.bz2 \ http://mysite.verizon.net/res00a7j/cygwin-1.7/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup-1.2.8-3.tar.bz2 \

libsasl2 setup.hint glitch

Hi! From current setup.ini: @ libsasl2 sdesc: The Cyrus SASL API implementation. (Development files) . . @ libsasl2-devel sdesc: The Cyrus SASL API implementation. (Runtime library) That's backwards... Cheers, Peter

Re: Patch: Setup.exe - search for package

On Apr 1 16:50, Dave Korn wrote: One consequence of doing this is that it draws attention to the fact we need to implement minimum window size dimensions for the chooser page; it's bad enough that you can shrink it down far enough that controls slide off the left-hand edge, but it looks

Re: libsasl2 setup.hint glitch

On Apr 2 10:44, Peter Rosin wrote: Hi! From current setup.ini: @ libsasl2 sdesc: The Cyrus SASL API implementation. (Development files) . . @ libsasl2-devel sdesc: The Cyrus SASL API implementation. (Runtime library) That's backwards... Not only the description, also the requirements

Re: PING MAINTAINERS of ccache, distcc, ocaml: [was Re: [1.7] gcc-3.4.4-3 gets reinstalled every time I run setup]

Christopher Faylor wrote: I've made the change but I wonder if I should just remove ccache from the distro. I have never heard that anyone is using it. Here I am! -- Lapo Luchini - http://lapo.it/ “Real Programmers always confuse Christmas and Halloween because Oct31 == Dec25.” (Andrew

Re: PING MAINTAINERS of ccache, distcc, ocaml: [was Re: [1.7] gcc-3.4.4-3 gets reinstalled every time I run setup]

On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:55:38PM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: I've made the change but I wonder if I should just remove ccache from the distro. I have never heard that anyone is using it. Here I am! Yes. I get it:

Re: Re: Patch: Setup.exe - search for package

Dave Korn wrote: Dave Korn wrote: Andrew Punch wrote: Hi, I have attached a patch for searching packages in the package selection screen. The patch is against version 2.573.2.3 - I couldn't get the CVS head to build due to a libtool version problem. Thanks for contributing

[RFC] ready for cygport to default to gcc4?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Are maintainers ready for cygport-0.9 (for 1.7 only) to default to gcc4? Given the current situation with binutils and gcc, I am testing a patch that defines and exports: CC=gcc-4 -shared-libgcc CPP=cpp-4 CXX=g++-4 CXXCPP=cpp-4 F77=gfortran-4

Re: [RFC] ready for cygport to default to gcc4?

Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Are maintainers ready for cygport-0.9 (for 1.7 only) to default to gcc4? No. gcc4 is still an *experimental* release: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: experimental package: gcc4-4.3.2-2 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-03/msg00378.html We shouldn't default to using it until

Re: [RFC] ready for cygport to default to gcc4?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Charles Wilson wrote: gcc4 is still an *experimental* release: We shouldn't default to using it until the gcc maintainer is confident enough in it to promote it officially. I know it's a bit of a chicken/egg problem, but there you go. 1) A

R: [RFC] ready for cygport to default to gcc4?

--- Ven 3/4/09, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) ha scritto: Da: Yaakov (Cygwin/X) Oggetto: [RFC] ready for cygport to default to gcc4? A: cygwin-apps Data: Venerdì 3 Aprile 2009, 02:50 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Are maintainers ready for cygport-0.9 (for 1.7 only) to default