On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 05:29:00PM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> There has been a new release of the official cmake (2.6.4-1).
> This is a minor release from to 2.6.2 to 2.6.4.
>
> Here are the required files:
>
> http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/setup.hint
> http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/cmake
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:37:15AM -0700, David Rothenberger wrote:
>wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res00a7j/cygwin-1.7/subversion/setup.hint \
>
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res00a7j/cygwin-1.7/subversion/subversion-1.6.2-2-src.tar.bz2
> \
>
> http://mysite.verizon.net
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 09:52:31PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
> New test release for cygwin 1.5
>
> cd release
> D=http://www.math.cornell.edu/~kbrown/cygwin-1.5
> wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \
> ${D}/emacs/setup.hint \
> ${D}/emacs/emacs-23.0.92-2-src.tar.bz2 \
> ${D}/emacs/emacs-23.0.92-2.tar.bz2
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 08:32:33PM +0400, Kostya Altukhov wrote:
>New build for cygwin-1.7 is now available. Compiled using gcc-4.
>
>category: Net
>requires: cygwin glib2 libncurses9 openssl perl
>sdesc:"A terminal based IRC client."
>ldesc:"A terminal based IRC client.
>Supports autologgi
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:09:32PM +1000, David Billinghurst wrote:
> A build of gmp-4.3.1-1 for cygwin 1.7 is available for upload. This is a
> routine dot release from upstream.
>
> ==
>
> D=http://billinghurst.customer.netspac
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:19:41PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>There is a new version 4.0-1 of brltty, please upload
Uploaded.
cgf
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 01:11:11PM -0400, Jonathon Merz wrote:
>>On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:23:36AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> That does
Václav Haisman wrote:
>
> I have had similar problem with log4cplus 1.0.3 and it was fixed by adding
> -Wl,--enable-auto-import. Does it not help in your case?
Yep, now works with GCC4.
http://lapo.it/cygwin/botan/setup.hint
http://lapo.it/cygwin/botan/botan-1.8.1-1.tar.bz2
http://lapo.it/cygwin
There has been a new release of the official cmake (2.6.4-1).
This is a minor release from to 2.6.2 to 2.6.4.
Here are the required files:
http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/setup.hint
http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/cmake-2.6.4-1.tar.bz2
http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/cmake-2.6.4-1-src.tar.
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 21 10:12, Lapo Luchini wrote:
>> Hi there.
>> Today "wtf" failed on me: it's missing the OLOCA entry "WJFFM"!
>>
>> Just kidding, I guess Igor has been a bit busy and didn't re-roll the
>> package lately... as explained in the README it's easy to update the
>> packa
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 01:11:11PM -0400, Jonathon Merz wrote:
>On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:23:36AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
That doesn't sound right. That sounds like it means that you are
dit
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:23:36AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> That doesn't sound right. That sounds like it means that you are
>>> ditching the current behavior which I, and others, obviously are
>>> sa
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:23:36AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> That doesn't sound right. That sounds like it means that you are
>> ditching the current behavior which I, and others, obviously are
>> satisfied with, in favor of forcing people to resize the chooser scr
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> That doesn't sound right. That sounds like it means that you are
> ditching the current behavior which I, and others, obviously are
> satisfied with, in favor of forcing people to resize the chooser screen
> themselves.
I thought that was the whole point, here. That t
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 08:39:52AM -0400, Jonathon Merz wrote:
>On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> This patch doesn't do what I expected. ?I thought that it would affect
>> the package chooser screen maximized settings but it doesn't seem to
>> touch that. ?I did manage
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> This patch doesn't do what I expected. I thought that it would affect
> the package chooser screen maximized settings but it doesn't seem to
> touch that. I did manage to do something that made the initial screen
> maximized, though, a
16 matches
Mail list logo
