Re: emacs package size

2009-06-14 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 05:59:50PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote: >2009/6/13 Ken Brown: >> The growth actually occurred with version 22 and was discussed a couple >> years ago (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2007-07/msg00047.html). ??The >> main problem is that the binary itself is huge, so I don't thi

Re: emacs package size

2009-06-14 Thread Andy Koppe
2009/6/13 Ken Brown: > The growth actually occurred with version 22 and was discussed a couple > years ago (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2007-07/msg00047.html).  The > main problem is that the binary itself is huge, so I don't think there's > much I can do about it.  Another factor is that ther