Re: [RFU] vorbis-tools 1.4.0-1

2010-07-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 8 11:01, David Rothenberger wrote: > Please leave 1.2.0-2 as previous. > > wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ > > http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/vorbis-tools/vorbis-tools-1.4.0-1-src.tar.bz2 > \ > > http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/vorbis-tools/vorbis-t

Re: RFU: cppcheck-1.44-1

2010-07-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 11 08:14, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > Please upload: > > --- > > wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=1 \ > http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/cppcheck/cppcheck-1.44-1.tar.bz2 \ > http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/cppcheck/cppcheck-1.44-1-src.tar.bz2 > > --- > > Keep cppcheck-1.43-1 as previous and all others

Re: RFU: nasm-2.08.02-1

2010-07-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 12 00:50, Dean Scarff wrote: > Upstream release, please upload. > > wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ > http://scarff.id.au/file/cygwin/nasm/nasm-2.08.02-1-src.tar.bz2 \ > http://scarff.id.au/file/cygwin/nasm/nasm-2.08.02-1.tar.bz2 Uploaded. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen

Re: [ITP] libtheora - Xiph.Org's video codec

2010-07-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 6 16:40, David Rothenberger wrote: > I'd like to package libtheora. It is part of Debian Stable[1]. > [...] > download: > -- > wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ > http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/libtheora/setu

Re: gcc4: next release (Dave Korn we need you)

2010-07-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 8 08:25, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 7/8/2010 3:22 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Jul 7 18:24, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> [...] > >> Whether we use w32api in the cygwin tree or from somewhere else really > >> doesn't matter as long as Cygwin builds. > > > > That's why I'd like to k

RFC: cygport cross-compiling APIs

2010-07-12 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
I think I'm getting close to nailing down cross-compiling support in cygport. Throughout, the prefix=/usr assumption has been removed; *-*-mingw* hosts use /mingw, everything else is /usr for now. (Anyone know any specific systems where that's not the case?) Cross-compiled packages are properly

Re: gcc4: next release (Dave Korn we need you)

2010-07-12 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:41 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > That's something I'll doo as soon as we really intend to switch the > Cygwin build to mingw64's w32api. Right now, what I get from all the > gory details, it's not that easy to keep mingw64's w32api headers and > libs apart from the ming

Re: gcc4: next release (Dave Korn we need you)

2010-07-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 12 05:25, Yaakov S wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:41 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > You're missing number 4. Cygwin and Mingw are targeting the same > > underlying "real" target, which is Windows. Both systems use different > > approaches and both have their own set of libs and head

Re: cygport cross compile(r) support [was: Re: cygport patch: suppress libtool fixup step]

2010-07-12 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/12/2010 1:49 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 14:43 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >> However, it's easier to walk before you run, so how about we get >> everything nice and pretty with two (three, counting mingw.org) separate >> non-multilib tool chains. Each would be built

Re: gcc4: next release (Dave Korn we need you)

2010-07-12 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/12/2010 8:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jul 12 05:25, Yaakov S wrote: >> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:41 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> You're missing number 4. Cygwin and Mingw are targeting the same >>> underlying "real" target, which is Windows. I wasn't actually "missing" it; I ju

Re: RFC: cygport cross-compiling APIs

2010-07-12 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/12/2010 6:19 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: I think I'm getting close to nailing down cross-compiling support in cygport. Great! (Is your current state checked in to git master or some other branch?) Throughout, the prefix=/usr assumption has been removed; *-*-mingw* hosts use /mingw, ev

Re: RFC: cygport cross-compiling APIs

2010-07-12 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 14:41 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > Are we sure about this, given mingw64's express desire to avoid this > $prefix -- specifically because "the other mingw" has historically used > it, and "the other mingw" has had its preferences enshrined in the > upstream gcc source cod

Re: RFC: cygport cross-compiling APIs

2010-07-12 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/12/2010 6:06 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 14:41 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >> Are we sure about this, given mingw64's express desire to avoid this >> $prefix -- specifically because "the other mingw" has historically used >> it, and "the other mingw" has had its pre

Re: RFC: cygport cross-compiling APIs

2010-07-12 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 22:45 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > I don't really care either way about that one. What about things > associated with $sysconfdir and $localstatedir? (e.g. /etc and /var are > usually "outside" of $prefix). For cross (clients), suppress > prep_etc_defaults, and assume $sy