On Aug 5 20:34, Andy Koppe wrote:
> Please upload:
>
> wget http://mintty.googlecode.com/files/mintty-0.8.1-1.tar.bz2
> wget http://mintty.googlecode.com/files/mintty-0.8.1-1-src.tar.bz2
>
> Please delete 0.6.2-1, leaving 0.7.1-1 as previous.
Done.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 5 21:18, Yaakov S wrote:
> mm-common provides a common build infrastructure for the GNOME C++
> bindings (aka GTKmm). This is required at build-time for all packages
> using gtkmm_autoreconf and gtkmm_compile.
>
> mm-common is already in Fedora and Debian.
>
> ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/p
On 23 July 2010 05:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Andy Koppe wrote:
>> [disable instant dependency updates and rely on resolver page instead]
>
> Now we get to find the bug reports hiding behind this bug.
Found one, and it's big. The dependency resolver page only adds direct
dependencies of packa
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:25:54PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>On 23 July 2010 05:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Andy Koppe wrote:
>>> [disable instant dependency updates and rely on resolver page instead]
>>
>> Now we get to find the bug reports hiding behind this bug.
>
>Found one, and it's big.
On Aug 6 09:33, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:25:54PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
> >On 23 July 2010 05:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> Andy Koppe wrote:
> >>> [disable instant dependency updates and rely on resolver page instead]
> >>
> >> Now we get to find the bug repor
On 6 August 2010 17:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 6 09:33, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:25:54PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> >On 23 July 2010 05:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >> Andy Koppe wrote:
>> >>> [disable instant dependency updates and rely on resolver pa
> I obviously didn't test this properly. Andrew, please remove the gold
> star I got for this.
Doh! I don't think this has ever happened before!
I'll have to think about it. Maybe half a star... or a pewter star :)
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:25:13PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>> I obviously didn't test this properly. Andrew, please remove the gold
>> star I got for this.
>
>Doh! I don't think this has ever happened before!
>
>I'll have to think about it. Maybe half a star... or a pewter star :)
Except f
On 6 August 2010 18:09, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 6 August 2010 17:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:25:54PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>>> >The dependency resolver page only adds direct
>>> >dependencies of packages that have been selected, not indirect ones,
>>> >so you end up
> Except for people who volunteer to support a package and then disappear,
> I don't think we should be eliminating gold stars. If we removed stars
> because of bugs we'd set very unrealistic expectations.
Works for me.
On 6 August 2010 19:38, Marco Moreno wrote:
> Note that the tooltip still shows "Partial" instead of "Pending" when mousing
> over the View button.
I had changed that actually, but it looks like Jon accidentally
reverted it in the 2010-07-29 checkin. I'll change it again.
Andy
On Aug 6 19:21, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 6 August 2010 18:09, Andy Koppe wrote:
> > On 6 August 2010 17:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:25:54PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
> >>> >The dependency resolver page only adds direct
> >>> >dependencies of packages that have been se
On Aug 6 22:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 6 19:21, Andy Koppe wrote:
> > On 6 August 2010 18:09, Andy Koppe wrote:
> > > On 6 August 2010 17:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >>> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:25:54PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
> > >>> >The dependency resolver page only adds direc
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:26:02PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Aug 6 22:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Aug 6 19:21, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> > On 6 August 2010 18:09, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> > > On 6 August 2010 17:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > >>> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:25:54PM +0100,
On 6 August 2010 21:36, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:26:02PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>Here's another test with only selecting the vorbis-tools package.
>>With the current setup from CVS:
>>
>> Package: libao4
>> Required by: vorbis-tools
>>
>> Package: l
On Aug 6 21:52, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 6 August 2010 21:36, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:26:02PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>Looks still good, doesn't it?
> >
> > Yep. Andy do you agree?
>
> I'm still working on a patch that tries to address this without a
> s
On Aug 6 22:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 6 22:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > I had a go at it [...]
> Here's another test with only selecting the vorbis-tools package.
> [...]
And, while we're at it, do we *really* have to create such a detailed
dependency view? Wouldn't it be much les
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:06:38PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Aug 6 22:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Aug 6 22:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > I had a go at it [...]
>> Here's another test with only selecting the vorbis-tools package.
>> [...]
>
>And, while we're at it, do we *really*
On Aug 6 17:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:06:38PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Aug 6 22:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Aug 6 22:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> > I had a go at it [...]
> >> Here's another test with only selecting the vorbis-tools packag
On Aug 6 23:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 6 17:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > Why not present as much info as possible? I don't know what "libkate"
> > is but it would be nice to be able to satisfy my curiousity on that page
> > rather than jumping to a web page and googling.
>
> Well
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:18:58PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>Well, that's ok. But I don't think it's important to learn where the
>dependency comes from. If you want to know what the missing package
>provides, the sdesc might be more informative, like this:
>
> libao versi
On 6 August 2010 21:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> I had a go at it, see below. Does it make sense? I tested this by
>> selecting *only* the flac-devel package, which resulted in the following
>> "Resolve Dependecies" dialog:
>>
>> Package: libFLAC++6
>> Required by: flac-devel
>>
>>
On 8/6/2010 5:18 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 6 17:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Why not present as much info as possible? I don't know what "libkate"
is but it would be nice to be able to satisfy my curiousity on that page
rather than jumping to a web page and googling.
Well, that's o
On 6 August 2010 21:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> + for (n = unmet.begin (); n != unmet.end (); ++n)
> + {
> + if (!(*n).first->prereq_checked ())
> + {
> + (*n).first->prereq_checked (true);
> + for (vector *>::iterator i =
> +
On 6 August 2010 22:43, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 6 August 2010 21:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> + for (n = unmet.begin (); n != unmet.end (); ++n)
>> + {
>> + if (!(*n).first->prereq_checked ())
>> + {
>> + (*n).first->prereq_checked (true);
>> +
I wish to maintain rtorrent and the additional libraries it requires
that are not currently part of the Cygwin distribution:
libsigc++-2.0-2.2.8-1:
wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=1 \
http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/libsigc++/setup.hint \
http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/libsigc++/libsigc++2.0-2.2.8-1-src.
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:29:43PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>FWIW, attached is my take on a fix for this. Getting the same
>dependencies, but additional "Required bys". (Actually libcurl4 and
>libssh2_1 are extra dependencies, but I assume you already have them
>installed.
This seems to do the s
On 7 August 2010 05:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:29:43PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>>FWIW, attached is my take on a fix for this. Getting the same
>>dependencies, but additional "Required bys". (Actually libcurl4 and
>>libssh2_1 are extra dependencies, but I assume yo
28 matches
Mail list logo
