Re: [ITA] ocaml 3.12.0

2010-09-10 Thread Damien Doligez
On 2010-09-09, at 21:07, Andrew Schulman wrote: > Auto gold star awarded: http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#DD. Ooooh, shiny! Thanks! > And a thanks from me - the OCaml package was way out of date, but I tried > once to build it for Cygwin and couldn't make it work. But I'm cheating: I have insi

Re: [ITA] ocaml 3.12.0

2010-09-10 Thread Andrew Schulman
> > And a thanks from me - the OCaml package was way out of date, but I tried > > once to build it for Cygwin and couldn't make it work. > > But I'm cheating: I have insider information. No holds barred here at cygwin.com.

Re: [ITP] mingw-w64 Second try

2010-09-10 Thread JonY
On 9/10/2010 08:51, JonY wrote: On 9/10/2010 07:09, Charles Wilson wrote: On 9/9/2010 6:10 AM, JonY wrote: OK, we're amost there. binutils and runtime are GTG. gcc, headers, and pthreads are really close. Everything rebuilds from source fine, and the uploaded packages actually match the