On 2010-09-09, at 21:07, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> Auto gold star awarded: http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#DD.
Ooooh, shiny! Thanks!
> And a thanks from me - the OCaml package was way out of date, but I tried
> once to build it for Cygwin and couldn't make it work.
But I'm cheating: I have insi
> > And a thanks from me - the OCaml package was way out of date, but I tried
> > once to build it for Cygwin and couldn't make it work.
>
> But I'm cheating: I have insider information.
No holds barred here at cygwin.com.
On 9/10/2010 08:51, JonY wrote:
On 9/10/2010 07:09, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 9/9/2010 6:10 AM, JonY wrote:
OK, we're amost there.
binutils and runtime are GTG.
gcc, headers, and pthreads are really close.
Everything rebuilds from source fine, and the uploaded packages actually
match the