[RFU] subversion-1.6.15-1

2010-11-30 Thread David Rothenberger
Please delete 1.6.12-2 and leave 1.6.13-1 as the previous version. wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/setup.hint \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/subversion-1.6.15-1-src.tar.bz2 \ http://home.comcast.net/

[RFU] libvorbis-1.3.2-1

2010-11-30 Thread David Rothenberger
Please remove 1.2.3-1 and leave 1.3.1-1 as the previous version. wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/libvorbis/setup.hint \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/libvorbis/libvorbisfile3/setup.hint \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rot

[RFU] libogg-1.2.1-1

2010-11-30 Thread David Rothenberger
Please delete 1.1.4-1 and leave 1.2.0-1 as the previous version. wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/libogg/setup.hint \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/libogg/libogg0/setup.hint \ http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwi

Re: [RFU] mingw64-x86_64

2010-11-30 Thread JonY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/2010 00:04, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 11/30/2010 9:59 AM, JonY wrote: >> Note that mingw64-*-runtime versioning scheme changed, with appropriate >> setup.hint changes added, hopefully correctly. > > Done. There were a few links missing (such

Re: [RFU] mingw64-i686

2010-11-30 Thread JonY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/2010 00:03, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 11/30/2010 9:52 AM, JonY wrote: >> Note that mingw64-*-runtime versioning scheme changed, with appropriate >> setup.hint changes added, hopefully correctly. >> > > Done. (You were missing the links to the

Re: Do we need a new maintainer for fetchmail?

2010-11-30 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 07:58:51PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Nov 30 12:31, Andrew Schulman wrote: >> > YAMWHTLT >> >> Acronym! >> >> http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#YAMWHTLT > >Quick reaction, Andrew :) Yeah, it was a real QRA. cgf

Re: sqlite3: please update

2010-11-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 4 15:07, Yaakov S wrote: > On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 02:04 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > > Cygwin's sqlite3 (3.6.21) is ten months old, and some current software > > already needs more recent versions. Could you please update sqlite3 to > > the latest upstream release (currently 3.7.2)? >

Re: Do we need a new maintainer for fetchmail?

2010-11-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 30 12:31, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > YAMWHTLT > > Acronym! > > http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#YAMWHTLT Quick reaction, Andrew :) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat

Re: Do we need a new maintainer for fetchmail?

2010-11-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 30 12:56, Jason Tishler wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:42:12PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Nov 30 01:30, Matthias Andree wrote: > > > I have provided Jason Tishler with up to date packages for the > > > current fetchmail 6.3.18 package (with selected upstream fixes from > > >

Re: Do we need a new maintainer for fetchmail?

2010-11-30 Thread Andrew Schulman
> As I indicated to Matthias in private email, I have good intentions but > very limited free time. YAMWHTLT

Re: Do we need a new maintainer for fetchmail?

2010-11-30 Thread Jason Tishler
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:42:12PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 30 01:30, Matthias Andree wrote: > > I have provided Jason Tishler with up to date packages for the > > current fetchmail 6.3.18 package (with selected upstream fixes from > > post-6.3.18 Git) a fortnight ago, built on Cygwi

Re: Do we need a new maintainer for fetchmail?

2010-11-30 Thread Andrew Schulman
> YAMWHTLT Acronym! http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#YAMWHTLT

Re: [RFU] mingw64-x86_64

2010-11-30 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/30/2010 9:59 AM, JonY wrote: > Note that mingw64-*-runtime versioning scheme changed, with appropriate > setup.hint changes added, hopefully correctly. Done. There were a few links missing (such as to some setup.hint files) but I got them from sourceforge anyway.) -- Chuck

Re: [RFU] mingw64-i686

2010-11-30 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/30/2010 9:52 AM, JonY wrote: > Note that mingw64-*-runtime versioning scheme changed, with appropriate > setup.hint changes added, hopefully correctly. > Done. (You were missing the links to the new -runtime files, but I got them from sourceforge anyway). -- Chuck

Re: Do we need a new maintainer for fetchmail?

2010-11-30 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 30.11.2010 16:12, schrieb Corinna Vinschen: > We don't have a problem with maintainance sharing and we already have > packages doing that. The X server is maintained by two guys, for > instance. But it's an item of consent between the sharing maintainers. Sure. This won't work in competition

[RFU] mingw64-x86_64

2010-11-30 Thread JonY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Note that mingw64-*-runtime versioning scheme changed, with appropriate setup.hint changes added, hopefully correctly. http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-x86_64/mingw64-x86_64-pthreads/setup.hint/download

Re: Do we need a new maintainer for fetchmail?

2010-11-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 30 15:08, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 30.11.2010 13:42, schrieb Corinna Vinschen: > > > So, first I'd really like to get a word from you, Jason. > > > > If Jason is AWOL for a longer period of time (which I doubt, since he > > was still active on the cygwin list early November), then we ca

[RFU] mingw64-i686

2010-11-30 Thread JonY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Note that mingw64-*-runtime versioning scheme changed, with appropriate setup.hint changes added, hopefully correctly. http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/mingw64-i686-pthreads/setup.hint/download htt

Re: Do we need a new maintainer for fetchmail?

2010-11-30 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 30.11.2010 13:42, schrieb Corinna Vinschen: > So, first I'd really like to get a word from you, Jason. > > If Jason is AWOL for a longer period of time (which I doubt, since he > was still active on the cygwin list early November), then we can talk > about taking over maintainership, if that's

Re: Do we need a new maintainer for fetchmail?

2010-11-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 30 01:30, Matthias Andree wrote: > Greetings, > > the fetchmail package for Cygwin is at version 6.3.9, released two years ago, > and with known security vulnerabilities and errata: > > CVE-2009-2666 - improper TLS cert validation allows MITM attacks to go > unnoticed > CVE-2010-1167 - he