Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-14 Thread Andy Koppe
On 27 July 2011 18:30, Warren Young wrote: > - Do we need more sizes?  I've seen reference to odd sizes like 64x64 and > 96x96, but surely we can trust Vista+ to scale the 256x256 to these sizes > without needing hand-tweaked versions? Picking up on an old point here. As Warren suggests, the 64x64

Re: [PATCH] Remove Prev button from setup.exe's chooser page

2011-08-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 13 21:38, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 13 August 2011 08:52, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Andy, > > > > On Jul 17 20:26, Andy Koppe wrote: > >> Attached is a patch for removing the Prev radio button from > >> setup.exe's chooser page. As previously discussed at [1], that button > >> doesn't really

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Make setup -q -P work as expected

2011-08-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 13 15:44, Jon TURNEY wrote: > On 13/08/2011 08:51, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Hi Jon, > > > >On Jul 22 14:22, Jon TURNEY wrote: > >>I'm somewhat reluctant to mess with this code as it is rather convoluted, > >>so these > >>patches could probably use some careful review and/or testing. > >>

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 13 21:35, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 13 August 2011 08:58, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Aug 12 20:37, Andy Koppe wrote: > >> > There's no rush.  Even if I check in the current icons to the setup > >> > repository, we're not quite finished anyway.  Andy was trying to take > >> > another stab at

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 14 09:18, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 27 July 2011 18:30, Warren Young wrote: > > - Do we need more sizes?  I've seen reference to odd sizes like 64x64 and > > 96x96, but surely we can trust Vista+ to scale the 256x256 to these sizes > > without needing hand-tweaked versions? > > Picking up on a

Re: GCC dependencies (attn David Billinghurst)

2011-08-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 13 18:20, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2011-08-13 13:28 skrev Corinna Vinschen: > > Hi Dave, Hi Yaakov, > > > > On Aug 12 11:21, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > >> On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 16:48 +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > >>> Thanks. I'm not too sure about not installing the .la files; won't that > >

Re: GCC dependencies (attn David Billinghurst)

2011-08-14 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 16:11 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > BTW, for those interested, I'm already working on updating the Fedora > > Cygwin toolchain to match the recent binutils/gdb releases and add the > > --large-address-aware patch, along with restoring cygwin-gcc-java for > > F15. FYI, th

Re: GCC dependencies (attn David Billinghurst)

2011-08-14 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2011-08-14 13:20 skrev Corinna Vinschen: > On Aug 13 18:20, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Den 2011-08-13 13:28 skrev Corinna Vinschen: >>> here's a minor nit, but that bugs me for a while now. >>> >>> $ cc hello.c >>> $ ./a.out >>> bash: ./a.out: No such file or directory >>> >>> I would like to

Re: GCC dependencies (attn David Billinghurst)

2011-08-14 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 14:29 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 16:11 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > BTW, for those interested, I'm already working on updating the Fedora > > > Cygwin toolchain to match the recent binutils/gdb releases and add the > > > --large-address-awa

RFU: cppcheck-1.50-1

2011-08-14 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Please upload: --- wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=1 \ http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/cppcheck/cppcheck-1.50-1.tar.bz2 \ http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/cppcheck/cppcheck-1.50-1-src.tar.bz2 --- Please leave 1.49-1 as previous and feel free to remove older releases. Thank you, Chris