On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 06:26:34PM -0700, Cary R. wrote:
>FYI expect is what drew me to Tcl/Tk a very long time ago.
>
>Trust that I understand the need to be using a more modern version of
>Tcl/Tk. I'm just whining that we're going to loose the GDI support.
>Since I'm not going to do anything to
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:31:28AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 26/10/2011 22:02, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>> cgf has asked me to take over tcl/tk/expect maintainership and
>> transition the distro from our Win32/GDI hybrid 8.4 to the *NIX/X11 8.5
>> currently in Ports.
>
> To anyone feeling appreh
On 26/10/2011 22:02, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> cgf has asked me to take over tcl/tk/expect maintainership and
> transition the distro from our Win32/GDI hybrid 8.4 to the *NIX/X11 8.5
> currently in Ports.
To anyone feeling apprehensive, I've been using the 'ports versions of tcl
and expect for
And I've been using Cygwin for over a decade. While I'm at it
thanks to all for making life bearable on a windows machine!
FYI expect is what drew me to Tcl/Tk a very long time ago.
Trust that I understand the need to be using a more modern
version of Tcl/Tk. I'm just whining that we're going to
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 16:02 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> * ruby (Corinna Vinschen)
> new requires: tcl tcl-tk
> notes: I suggest making a make separate ruby-tcltk package due to the
> additional deps.
Patches for 1.8.7-p352 attached.
Yaakov
libuuid from util-linux hides the w32api libuuid.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:59:18PM -0700, Cary R. wrote:
>I already spend most of my free time working on an open source Verilog
>simulator, so unfortunately, no, I'm not going to volunteer. I
>understand the reason for switching, but be prepared for some serious
>user complaints once this is impl
I already spend most of my free time working on an
open source Verilog simulator, so unfortunately, no,
I'm not goingto volunteer. I understand the reason
for switching,but be prepared for some serious user
complaintsonce this is implemented.
I don't normally have time to read the general cygwin
On 10/26/2011 5:53 PM, Cary R. wrote:
> If I'm understanding this correctly once this change has been
> pushed we will be required to start an X server beforerunning
> gitk.
Yes.
> As someone who uses git and gitk all the time having to
> start the X server to run gitk is a pain. I haven't checke
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 02:53:48PM -0700, Cary R. wrote:
>Yaakov,
>
>
>
>If I'm understanding this correctly once this change has been
>pushed we will be required to start an X server beforerunning
>gitk. As someone who uses git and gitk all the time having to
>start the X server to run gitk is a p
Yaakov,
If I'm understanding this correctly once this change has been
pushed we will be required to start an X server beforerunning
gitk. As someone who uses git and gitk all the time having to
start the X server to run gitk is a pain. I haven't checked this
recently, but in the past the X serve
On 10/26/2011 11:24 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
stupid question: should not be easier for testing the new packages
and upgrading the other ones that you put them in the distro as
experimental ?
I know that the maintainers you mentioned have no problems
but eventually there are other people that nee
On 10/26/2011 11:06 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 16:02 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
The following packages will need an IMMEDIATE rebuild:
Oops, I missed one:
* brltty [tcl-brlapi] (Samuel Thibault)
new requires: tcl
Yaakov
stupid question: should not be easier
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 16:02 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> The following packages will need an IMMEDIATE rebuild:
Oops, I missed one:
* brltty [tcl-brlapi] (Samuel Thibault)
new requires: tcl
Yaakov
cgf has asked me to take over tcl/tk/expect maintainership and
transition the distro from our Win32/GDI hybrid 8.4 to the *NIX/X11 8.5
currently in Ports.
ITA:
expect
tcltk (to be obsoleted)
ITP (in place of tcltk):
tcl
tcl-itcl
tcl-itk
tcl-iwidgets
tcl-tix
tcl-tk
(I have more extensions in Port
On 26/10/2011 09:12, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 09:37 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> something's not quite correct:
>>
>>> upset: *** setup.ini: warning - package gcc4-java requires non-existent
>>> package java-ecj
>> For now I just removed the dependency t
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 09:24:22AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>I'm wondering if the raw mail address filter isn't a bit overagressive.
>Am I mistaken or has the traffic on the cygwin ML gone down a lot
>lately?
I thought it was obvious that I spend some time every day dealing with
spam, bounce
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 09:37 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> something's not quite correct:
>
> > upset: *** setup.ini: warning - package gcc4-java requires non-existent
> > package java-ecj
>
> For now I just removed the dependency to java-ecj since there's no such
> package on so
Hi Dave,
something's not quite correct:
> upset: *** setup.ini: warning - package gcc4-java requires non-existent
> package java-ecj
For now I just removed the dependency to java-ecj since there's no such
package on sourceware. What's missing here?
Corinna
On Oct 26 02:27, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:17:40AM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > >> >Hm, you're right. But the odd thing is that they weren't posted to the
> > >> >cygwin
> > >> >list, which is where I read them: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-10/.
> > >> >
> >
19 matches
Mail list logo
