Re: tar.xz packages?

2012-01-31 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:11:20PM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 03:37 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> I'm not quite sure, but isn't it right that setup is capable of handling >> xz compressed tar files in the meantime? > >> If we decide this is desirable, do we just conv

Re: tar.xz packages?

2012-01-31 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 20:11 -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > > Yes, I know. The mirrors! The mirrors! They will have to download the > > equivalent of 1.5 times a full release! > > An alternative would be to repack only the binary tarballs, not the > source ones. The -src tarballs are generally

Re: tar.xz packages?

2012-01-31 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 03:37 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > I'm not quite sure, but isn't it right that setup is capable of handling > xz compressed tar files in the meantime? I have a patch for cygport to generate xz packages ready, which will fix this for many packagers. Whatever others are us

Re: ITP fossil - DVCS with built-in wiki, http server and issue tracker

2012-01-31 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
PCYMTNQREAIYR! On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 13:48 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > Now fixed to "requires: libopenssl098" The correct dependencies are requires: libopenssl098 zlib0. > wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3 \ > > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/fossil/fossil-201112131

Re: tar.xz packages?

2012-01-31 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:37:11PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >Another possibility is not to use .xz as an extension but decide to use >some other extension (.cyg). Then the format could change while the name >stays the same. ...the next time we decide to do this, that is... cgf

Re: tar.xz packages?

2012-01-31 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:19:47PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Jan 31 12:59, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:37:48PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >I'm not quite sure, but isn't it right that setup is capable of handling >> >xz compressed tar files in the meantime

Re: tar.xz packages?

2012-01-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 31 12:59, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:37:48PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >I'm not quite sure, but isn't it right that setup is capable of handling > >xz compressed tar files in the meantime? Chris, does upset handle them > >as well? > > No, but I'm happy to

Re: tar.xz packages?

2012-01-31 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:37:48PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >I'm not quite sure, but isn't it right that setup is capable of handling >xz compressed tar files in the meantime? Chris, does upset handle them >as well? No, but I'm happy to make the change. I've been meaning to suggest this, a

Re: OBSOLETED: minires

2012-01-31 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
On 31.01.2012 16:48, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Cool, thanks! Btw., did you see Yaakov's security related mails, by any chance? http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2012-01/msg00017.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2012-01/msg00029.html Yes, but I'm busy right now. I'll tackle these when

Re: OBSOLETED: minires

2012-01-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 31 16:31, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > On 31.01.2012 15:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Hi Gergely, > >Hi Volker, > > Hi > > >the minires resolver functionality has been moved into the Cygwin DLL > >since Cygwin 1.7.0. Only two packages still rely on minires, gnupg, > >and libopenldap2, libope

Re: OBSOLETED: minires

2012-01-31 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
On 31.01.2012 15:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Hi Gergely, Hi Volker, Hi the minires resolver functionality has been moved into the Cygwin DLL since Cygwin 1.7.0. Only two packages still rely on minires, gnupg, and libopenldap2, libopenldap2_2_7, and libopenldap2_3_0. Is there a achance we ca

Re: ITP pristine-tar-1.17-1 -- Regenerate pristine tarballs

2012-01-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 29 14:21, Jari Aalto wrote: > wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3 \ > > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/pristine-tar/pristine-tar-1.17-1-src.tar.bz2 > \ > > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/pristine-tar/pristine-tar-1.17-1.tar.bz2 \ > http://cante.net/~j

tar.xz packages?

2012-01-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi guys, I'm not quite sure, but isn't it right that setup is capable of handling xz compressed tar files in the meantime? Chris, does upset handle them as well? If so, shouldn't we start to switch to .tar.xz files? As far as I understand from a discussion on the gdb list (the discussion has g

Re: [SECURITY] lighttpd

2012-01-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 27 04:21, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 18:13 -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > > Lapo, > > > > Cygwin's lighttpd is still at 1.4.20, which is over three years old. > > In the meantime, ten more releases have occurred, some of which > > (including today's) fix security is

OBSOLETED: minires

2012-01-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Gergely, Hi Volker, the minires resolver functionality has been moved into the Cygwin DLL since Cygwin 1.7.0. Only two packages still rely on minires, gnupg, and libopenldap2, libopenldap2_2_7, and libopenldap2_3_0. Is there a achance we can update these packages soon so we can drop the minr

Re: RFU bsfilter 1.0.17-1

2012-01-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 30 16:32, Jari Aalto wrote: > wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3 \ > > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/bsfilter/bsfilter-1.0.17-1-src.tar.bz2 \ > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/bsfilter/bsfilter-1.0.17-1.tar.bz2 \ > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/b