Re: [RFC] Packaging texlive

2012-02-27 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 18:10 -0500, Ken Brown wrote: > I'm thinking about volunteering to package texlive for Cygwin. It's > present in many (if not all) major Linux distros, and it could replace > the obsolete tetex package if the tetex maintainer doesn't object. tetex is obsolete and needs to

Re: [RFC] Packaging texlive

2012-02-27 Thread Ken Brown
On 2/27/2012 5:51 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 18:10 -0500, Ken Brown wrote: I'm thinking about volunteering to package texlive for Cygwin. It's present in many (if not all) major Linux distros, and it could replace the obsolete tetex package if the tetex maintainer doesn'

Fwd: GnuPG maintainer wanted

2012-02-27 Thread marco atzeri
I will give a look. Any preference between 1.4.12 and 2.0.18 ? Marco Original Message Subject: GnuPG maintainer wanted Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:35:41 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen Hi folks, Since the original maintainer has apparently gone AWOL, we are in need of a maintaine

Re: Fwd: GnuPG maintainer wanted

2012-02-27 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/27/2012 8:56 AM, marco atzeri wrote: > I will give a look. > Any preference between 1.4.12 and 2.0.18 ? I made an attempt about two years ago to port gnupg 2.x. It has additional dependencies beyond those of 1.4.x, so I added all of those to the distro. However, I ran into a problem (relate

Re: [SECURITY] libpng vulnerabilities

2012-02-27 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/26/2012 3:02 AM, marco atzeri wrote: > All versions of libpng from 1.0.6 through 1.5.8, 1.4.8, 1.2.46, and > 1.0.56, respectively, fail to correctly validate a heap allocation in > png_decompress_chunk(), which can lead to a buffer-overrun and the > possibility of execution of hostile code on

Re: [RFC] Packaging texlive

2012-02-27 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/27/2012 5:51 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > TeX Live also replaces psutils, listed as maintained by Daniel > Boesswetter. AFACIS he hasn't posted to these lists since November > 2003, so I think it's fair to say that it's been orphaned. Is it possible to package this part in such a way that

[ITA] gnupg-1.4.12-1

2012-02-27 Thread marco atzeri
I noticed nothing wrong building from the sorce, it seems very standard. At least gnupg-1.4.x, while gnupg-2.x seems another beast with all the library dependencies. to download (remove the index.html's) : wget -r -np -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin-1.7/gnupg/index.html

Re: GnuPG maintainer wanted

2012-02-27 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 27 14:56, marco atzeri wrote: > [Re: GnuPG maintainer wanted] > I will give a look. > Any preference between 1.4.12 and 2.0.18 ? I don't know. The newer, the better? Corinna

[GOLDSTAR] Re: [ITA] gnupg-1.4.12-1

2012-02-27 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 27 16:36, marco atzeri wrote: > I noticed nothing wrong building from the sorce, > it seems very standard. > At least gnupg-1.4.x, while gnupg-2.x seems another beast with > all the library dependencies. > > to download (remove the index.html's) : > > wget -r -np -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ > http:

Re: Fwd: GnuPG maintainer wanted

2012-02-27 Thread marco atzeri
On 2/27/2012 4:26 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: On 2/27/2012 8:56 AM, marco atzeri wrote: I will give a look. Any preference between 1.4.12 and 2.0.18 ? I made an attempt about two years ago to port gnupg 2.x. It has additional dependencies beyond those of 1.4.x, so I added all of those to the di

Re: [RFC] Packaging texlive

2012-02-27 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 10:31 -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > Is it possible to package this part in such a way that I can install > "the replacement" psutils without pulling in all of TeX? texlive-collection-fontutils (which includes psutils) requires only perl, texlive (the binaries, and of course

cygwin mailing list

2012-02-27 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Jari, do you track the Cygwin mailing list for problems with your packages? If not, you should *really* do it... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat

Re: [GOLDSTAR] Re: [ITA] gnupg-1.4.12-1

2012-02-27 Thread Andrew Schulman
> On Feb 27 16:36, marco atzeri wrote: > > I noticed nothing wrong building from the sorce, > > it seems very standard. > > At least gnupg-1.4.x, while gnupg-2.x seems another beast with > > all the library dependencies. > > > > to download (remove the index.html's) : > > > > wget -r -np -nH --cu

RFU cloc 1.55-2

2012-02-27 Thread Jari Aalto
wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3 \ http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/cloc/cloc-1.55-2-src.tar.bz2 \ http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/cloc/cloc-1.55-2.tar.bz2 \ http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/cloc/setup.hint Shebang fix, Jari

Re: RFU cloc 1.55-2

2012-02-27 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 15:14 -0500, Jari Aalto wrote: > wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3 \ > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/cloc/cloc-1.55-2-src.tar.bz2 \ > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/cloc/cloc-1.55-2.tar.bz2 \ > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/cloc/s

Re: Fwd: GnuPG maintainer wanted

2012-02-27 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/27/2012 11:07 AM, marco atzeri wrote: > Thanks for status, > I was just wondering why most of the dependencies > where present but a bit old. Yep -- since the only thing those deps are actually used for, it seems, is gnupg-2.x, I haven't been keeping them up to date without an actual gnupg-2.

Re: [SECURITY] lighttpd

2012-02-27 Thread Lapo Luchini
Lapo Luchini wrote: > I will schedule an update-session for all my packages that needs it ...failing it; neither the current package nor cygwin-ports one upgrade cleanly and I hadn't the time to work around it. If anyone has the time to do this long-awaited upgrade or wants to take maintainership

[RFU] base-files-4.1-1

2012-02-27 Thread David Sastre Medina
Hello, Please upload base-files-4.1-1. http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.1-1.tar.bz2 http://crapsteak.org/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.1-1.tar.bz2.sig Thanks. -- Huella de clave primaria: AD8F BDC0 5A2C FD5F A179 60E7 F79B AB04 5299 EC56 signature.asc Des

Re: [RFU] base-files-4.1-1

2012-02-27 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 23:34 +0100, David Sastre Medina wrote: > Please upload base-files-4.1-1. Done. Yaakov

Re: [SECURITY] lighttpd

2012-02-27 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 22:33 +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: > ...failing it; neither the current package nor cygwin-ports one upgrade > cleanly and I hadn't the time to work around it. Could you clarify? > If anyone has the time to do this long-awaited upgrade or wants to take > maintainership of the

Re: [RFC] Packaging texlive

2012-02-27 Thread Ken Brown
On 2/27/2012 5:51 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: The texlive package provides only the binaries; all symlinked commands, macros, and documentation are provided by the texlive-collection-* packages, which mostly correspond to the individual TeX Live packages installed by each of the collection-* met

Re: [RFC] Packaging texlive

2012-02-27 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 23:09 -0500, Ken Brown wrote: > I do have one question about the various texlive-collection-* packages. > Do you have some automated way of getting the TeX Live package lists > that are in the .cygport files (TEXLIVE_TEXMF_PKGS, etc.)? The lists > can be gotten from the

Re: RFU cloc 1.55-2

2012-02-27 Thread Jari Aalto
2012-02-27 15:44 "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" : | On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 15:14 -0500, Jari Aalto wrote: | | > wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3 \ | > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/cloc/cloc-1.55-2-src.tar.bz2 \ | > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/cloc/cloc-1.55-2.tar.bz2 \

Re: cygwin mailing list

2012-02-27 Thread Jari Aalto
2012-02-27 14:35 Corinna Vinschen : | Hi Jari, | | do you track the Cygwin mailing list for problems with your packages? Yes, an update annouced, Jari

Re: RFU cloc 1.55-2

2012-02-27 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 00:37 -0500, Jari Aalto wrote: > 2012-02-27 15:44 "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" : http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR !!! > | There was another problem reported on the list: we'll need > | perl-Algorithm-Diff and perl-Regexp-Common packages (fortunately these > | modules don't d

[ITP] TeX Live dependencies

2012-02-27 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
These are all prerequisites for texlive, already in major distros: * dialog/libdialog10/libdialog-devel ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/release-2/dialog/ * openjpeg/libopenjpeg1/libopenjpeg-devel (for poppler) ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/uploads/openjpeg/ * python-imagi

[ITP] poppler (attn: xpdf maintainer)

2012-02-27 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
Another TeX Live dependency: ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/uploads/poppler/ ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/release-2/poppler-data/ Dr. Volker Zell, The command-line utilities in poppler conflict with those in xpdf. As poppler has more features and is better maintained, I

Re: RFU cloc 1.55-2 (RM package)

2012-02-27 Thread Jari Aalto
2012-02-27 15:44 "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" | On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 15:14 -0500, Jari Aalto wrote: | | > wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3 \ | > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/cloc/cloc-1.55-2-src.tar.bz2 \ | > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/cloc/cloc-1.55-2.tar.bz2 \

Re: RFU cloc 1.55-2 (RM package)

2012-02-27 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 02:20 -0500, Jari Aalto wrote: > 2012-02-27 15:44 "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" > | There was another problem reported on the list: we'll need > | perl-Algorithm-Diff and perl-Regexp-Common packages (fortunately these > | modules don't depend on any others AFAICS) for cloc to depend on.