Re: Opinions sought on TeX Live packaging

2012-07-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 30 18:38, Ken Brown wrote: > TeX Live upstream has thousands of packages, grouped into > "collections". Cygwin's TeX Live distribution, as originally > packaged by Yaakov, has one texlive-collection-* package for each > upstream collection. I've just discovered that about 1800 of the > ups

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2012-07-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Jon, On Jul 1 01:08, JonY wrote: > Hi, > > Here are the new builds, please remove the oldest versions from each > category, thanks. may I ask you a favor? It would be really helpful if you could add a statement what versions exactly to remove, perhaps even in the form of an easy `rm' comma

Re: Opinions sought on TeX Live packaging

2012-07-02 Thread Andy Koppe
On 30 June 2012 23:38, Ken Brown wrote: > TeX Live upstream has thousands of packages, grouped into "collections". > Cygwin's TeX Live distribution, as originally packaged by Yaakov, has one > texlive-collection-* package for each upstream collection. I've just > discovered that about 1800 of the

Re: [Patch] Rebase: new switch --ephemeral

2012-07-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 30 06:45, Achim Gratz wrote: > On Wednesday 20 June 2012, 11:33:17, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > If you really want -E to be an exclusive option, then what I'm missing > > is the enforcement on the command line. > > Here's a reworked patch (against rebase-4.2.0-1) that enforces mutual > exc

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2012-07-02 Thread JonY
On 7/2/2012 17:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Jul 1 01:08, JonY wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here are the new builds, please remove the oldest versions from each >> category, thanks. > > may I ask you a favor? It would be really helpful if you could add > a statement what versions exactly

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2012-07-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 2 17:43, JonY wrote: > On 7/2/2012 17:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Hi Jon, > > > > On Jul 1 01:08, JonY wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Here are the new builds, please remove the oldest versions from each > >> category, thanks. > > > > may I ask you a favor? It would be really helpful if

Re: Opinions sought on TeX Live packaging

2012-07-02 Thread Ken Brown
On 7/2/2012 5:29 AM, Andy Koppe wrote: On 30 June 2012 23:38, Ken Brown wrote: TeX Live upstream has thousands of packages, grouped into "collections". Cygwin's TeX Live distribution, as originally packaged by Yaakov, has one texlive-collection-* package for each upstream collection. I've just

Re: Opinions sought on TeX Live packaging

2012-07-02 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 18:38 -0400, Ken Brown wrote: > TeX Live upstream has thousands of packages, grouped into "collections". > Cygwin's TeX Live distribution, as originally packaged by Yaakov, has > one texlive-collection-* package for each upstream collection. I've > just discovered that a

Re: [Patch] Rebase: new switch --ephemeral

2012-07-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:32:03AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Jun 30 06:45, Achim Gratz wrote: >> On Wednesday 20 June 2012, 11:33:17, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> > If you really want -E to be an exclusive option, then what I'm missing >> > is the enforcement on the command line. >> >> Here