Re: [Patch] Rebase: new switch --ephemeral

2012-07-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:41:03AM +0200, ASSI wrote: >On Monday 02 July 2012, 11:49:08, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>I'm not paying close attention but I have to say that I really don't >>like the name "ephemeral" for a switch. Couldn't it be named more >>precisely to indicate what it is doing lik

Re: [Patch] Rebase: new switch --ephemeral

2012-07-03 Thread ASSI
On Monday 02 July 2012, 11:49:08, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I'm not paying close attention but I have to say that I really don't like > the name "ephemeral" for a switch. Couldn't it be named more precisely > to indicate what it is doing like --no-update-db or something like that? I'm not convi

Re: [Patch] Rebase: new switch --ephemeral

2012-07-03 Thread ASSI
On Monday 02 July 2012, 11:32:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Recording the ephemeral files in the database properly would likely > > require a new database format and more support functions, so I'm > > skipping that for now, I also don't see any need for that at the > > moment. > > You could also

RFU: cppcheck-1.55-1

2012-07-03 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Please upload: --- wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=1 \ http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/cppcheck/cppcheck-1.55-1.tar.bz2 \ http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/cppcheck/cppcheck-1.55-1-src.tar.bz2 --- Please leave 1.54-1 as previous and feel free to remove older releases. Thank you, Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe