Re: HEADSUP: Python 2.7 upgrade

2013-02-04 Thread Cygwin/X
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:56:56 -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > Jason Tishler announced last month[1] that he intends to upgrade Python > to 2.7 on 01 February, which is quickly approaching. > > If anybody needs them, my Python-dependent distro packages have been rebuilt > and are available in a s

Re: cygwin package for lyx-2.0.5.1. Re: lyx postinstall error - attention maintainer

2013-02-04 Thread Cygwin/X
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:34:04 -0600, Bo Peng wrote: > I have added fontconfig to the setup.hint file and replaced tetex > packages with texlive. Python was already there. Please upload the > files if the package is usable with the updated setup.hint > (http://www.houstonbioinformatics.org/temp). Mo

Re: HEADSUP: Python 2.7 upgrade

2013-02-04 Thread Cygwin/X
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:02:18 +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > ming is under /home/vzell on soureceware now, waiting to be staged Done. Yaakov

Re: cygwin package for lyx-2.0.5.1. Re: lyx postinstall error - attention maintainer

2013-02-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 4 09:34, Bo Peng wrote: > Hi, Marco, > > I have added fontconfig to the setup.hint file and replaced tetex > packages with texlive. Python was already there. Please upload the > files if the package is usable with the updated setup.hint > (http://www.houstonbioinformatics.org/temp). > >

Re: [PATCH 3/4] setup.exe

2013-02-04 Thread Achim Gratz
Here's the third patch again with all the changes requested by John integrated (and the subject line corrected). This is now fully tested (I hope I didn't forget anything). Additionally I have arranged that packages in categories "Base" and "Misc" can not be deleted, an attempt to do so will re-i

Re: Maintainer ping?

2013-02-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:18:52AM -0600, Yaakov wrote: >On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:53:55 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >On 2013-02-03 18:58, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>Given the problems that we seem to have with maintainers going absent >> >>would it make sense to send out a periodic ping ev

Re: cygwin package for lyx-2.0.5.1. Re: lyx postinstall error - attention maintainer

2013-02-04 Thread Bo Peng
Hi, Marco, I have added fontconfig to the setup.hint file and replaced tetex packages with texlive. Python was already there. Please upload the files if the package is usable with the updated setup.hint (http://www.houstonbioinformatics.org/temp). The LyX team maintains a native windows distribu

Re: HEADSUP: Python 2.7 upgrade

2013-02-04 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Yaakov writes: >> Dr. Volker Zell: lcms, ming > lcms is staged; waiting for ming. ming is under /home/vzell on soureceware now, waiting to be staged > Yaakov Ciao Volker

Re: Changing dependent library version numbers vs. test packages vs. requires: lines.

2013-02-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Dave, On Jan 18 14:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Dave? Ping? > > On Jan 14 11:50, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > > I've got a gcc-4.7.2 package almost ready to upload, but there's one > > > issue > > > I'm not sure what's best to do about. > > > > Any progress on a gcc-4.7.x re

Re: [SECURITY] lighttpd

2013-02-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 1 00:26, Yaakov wrote: > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 12:56:17 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Lapo? Ping? Are you still with us? > > It would seem not. :-( > > $ grep Lapo cygwin-pkg-maint > botan Lapo Luchini > bsdiff Lapo Luchini > libtidy-

Re: please upload: singular 3.1.6-2 packages

2013-02-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 1 15:23, Yue Ren wrote: > On behalf of the SINGULAR developer team, please upload the following > package updates for SINGULAR: > (In the 3.1.6-1 packages, some features were broken because apparently > some files do not liked to be compiled with gcc 3.4.4. Switching to a > newer version fi

Re: Maintainer ping?

2013-02-04 Thread Cygwin/X
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:53:55 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >On 2013-02-03 18:58, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>Given the problems that we seem to have with maintainers going absent > >>would it make sense to send out a periodic ping every M days to all > >>maintainers? Then if we didn't receiv