On 2/19/2013 20:53, JonY wrote:
On 2/19/2013 19:46, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:21:56 +0800, JonY wrote:
I can give Cygwin GCC a try over the weekends. Not sure if it is too
complicated.
Well, if someone else wants to take maintainership, feel free to over
take me :)
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:53 AM, JonY 10wa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2013 20:53, JonY wrote:
On 2/19/2013 19:46, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:21:56 +0800, JonY wrote:
I can give Cygwin GCC a try over the weekends. Not sure if it is too
complicated.
Well, if someone else
On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
I'll probably be releasing it as experimental.
There are local cygwin patches to gcc?
Yes, about 100KB of it. I confess I don't know what most of is for, my
understanding of the gcc
On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
I'll probably be releasing it as experimental.
There are local cygwin patches to gcc?
Yes, about 100KB of it. I confess I don't know what most of
On 2/21/2013 21:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
I'll probably be releasing it as experimental.
There are local cygwin patches to gcc?
Yes, about 100KB of
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
I'll probably be releasing it as experimental.
There are local cygwin patches to gcc?
Yes,
On 21 February 2013 10:38, NightStrike wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
I'll probably be releasing it as experimental.
On Feb 21 11:31, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
On 21 February 2013 10:38, NightStrike wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
I'll
On 2/22/2013 00:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 21 11:31, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
On 21 February 2013 10:38, NightStrike wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
I've started looking at the patches,
On 2/21/2013 10:48 PM, JonY wrote:
I have not looked at all the patches closely, but some of them were not
merged in gcc-4.7.2, at least the peflags patch did not.
Who is the upstream GCC maintainer for Cygwin anyway?
I would guess Dave Korn
Marco
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 05:48:20AM +0800, JonY wrote:
Who is the upstream GCC maintainer for Cygwin anyway?
It's Dave Korn, Kai Tietz, and me. I haven't been active for years
though. If you have patches that you'd like to get in maybe Kai
could expedite that.
cgf
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:59:07 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Exactly. The question is then, what patches from the 4.5.3 gcc were
not applied upstream and still make sense today.
I have a copy of the patchset here with a few additions of my own:
12 matches
Mail list logo
