On 3/14/2013 10:17 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 13 15:06, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
This patch adjusts the EXE name, ini/bz2 name, registry calls, and
default Cygwin root for x86_64. For now, setup64.exe is x86_64 only,
but hopefully this should allow a future patch to allow switching
Hi,
I built the 64 bit cmake version, but it segfaults on some tests.
So I am not sure if its cygwin dll or cmake fault.
Stackdump attached.
If anyone is interested to test it I can upload.
Any news of gfortran ?
I would try building some of my math libs: fftw3, lapack...
I guess it is time to
On Mar 16 07:24, marco atzeri wrote:
Hi,
I built the 64 bit cmake version, but it segfaults on some tests.
So I am not sure if its cygwin dll or cmake fault.
Stackdump attached.
Probably Cygwin, unfortunately :(
If anyone is interested to test it I can upload.
Any news of gfortran ?
I
On 3/16/2013 11:49 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 16 07:24, marco atzeri wrote:
I guess it is time to add the long double math functions to newlib
that I skipped years ago...
Oh, please!!! That would be incredible, fantastic, outstanding. The
OpenBSD sources contain i686 and x86_64
On Mar 16 12:18, marco atzeri wrote:
On 3/16/2013 11:49 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 16 07:24, marco atzeri wrote:
I guess it is time to add the long double math functions to newlib
that I skipped years ago...
Oh, please!!! That would be incredible, fantastic, outstanding. The
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 07:08:01 +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
how far we are from the 64bit setup release ?
I miss the dependency check of cygport ;-)
The setup code is ready to ship for 64bit; what's needed now is setting
up a cronjob to generate the setup64.ini. Hopefully that can be done
soon
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 07:24:49 +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
I built the 64 bit cmake version, but it segfaults on some tests.
So I am not sure if its cygwin dll or cmake fault.
Was this with -5 or -7? I'm finding -5 more reliable, despite the
limitation of no parallel make.
If anyone is
