Hi,
I've just run the setup64.exe following a procedure I use to defeat
UAC's privilege elevation based on the "setup" substring. That is I
renamed it to cygpkg64.exe and ran it as a non-privileged user.
I've noticed that this no longer defeats UAC, at least with 2.795 build
of setup64.exe.
Bas
On 4/2/2013 10:20 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
gii=1.0.2-3
ggi=2.2.2-3
misc=2.2.2-3
wmh=0.3.2-3
echo "
libgii1/libgii1-${gii}-src.tar.bz2
libgii1/libgii1-${gii}.tar.bz2
libgii1/setup.hint
libgii1/libgii1-devel/libgii1-devel-${gii}.tar.bz2
libgii1/libgii1-devel/setup.hint
libgii1/libgii1-input-x/libgii
Hi!
The cygport src-packages from 32bit distro, rebuilt for 64bit.
Cheers,
Peter
8<---
#!/bin/bash
# This script is intended to be executed from the 64bit/release/libggi
# directory. Create it if needed.
gii=1.0.2-3
ggi=2.2.2-3
misc=2.2.2-3
wmh=0.3.2-3
NightStrike writes:
> You might want to consider zipping ahead to the recently released 4.8
> where ppl isn't allowed anymore and you have to use isl as the cloog
> backend.
I'm operating under the assumption that there will be a release for
gcc-4.7.2 and that these packages should be available fo
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes:
>> http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/ppl
>> http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/cloog-ppl
>
> I'm looking at ppl right now. Is there any reason not
Hi folks,
I created a new 64 bit Cygwin 1.7.18-15 package an hour or so ago.
Unfortunately I screwed this up and accidentally created and uploaded a
32 bit package, rather than a 64 bit package. I found this out just a
couple of minutes ago. I'm now uploading a 64 bit -15, but there's a
chance
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes:
> http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/ppl
> http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/cloog-ppl
I'm looking at ppl right now. Is there any reason not to package the
latest version (1.0)?
Regards,
Achim.
--
I've added test packages compiled with gcc-4.7.2-1 (to be installed by
manually selecting them, like the test version of gcc itself):
wget="wget -xnH --cut-dirs=1 http://cygwin.stromeko.net/release";
$wget/mpclib/setup.hint
$wget/mpclib/mpclib-1.0.1-1-src.tar.bz2
$wget/mpclib/mpclib-1.0.1-1.tar.b
I've added test packages compiled with gcc-4.7.2-1 (to be installed by
manually selecting them, like the test version of gcc itself):
wget="wget -xnH --cut-dirs=1 http://cygwin.stromeko.net/release";
$wget/mpfr/setup.hint
$wget/mpfr/mpfr-3.1.1-1-src.tar.bz2
$wget/mpfr/mpfr-3.1.1-1.tar.bz2
$wget/mp
I've added test packages compiled with gcc-4.7.2-1 (to be installed by
manually selecting them, like the test version of gcc itself):
wget="wget -xnH --cut-dirs=1 http://cygwin.stromeko.net/release";
$wget/gmp/setup.hint
$wget/gmp/gmp-4.3.2-2.tar.bz2
$wget/gmp/gmp-4.3.2-2-src.tar.bz2
$wget/gmp/gm
On Apr 2 13:36, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> aalib is a prerequisite for the GGI packages, but the aalib maintainer
> (hello Dr. Volker Zell) hasn't responded to my query [1] and neither
> to the query by cgf [2], so here I am with a non-maintainer RFU...
Thank you, uploaded.
Corinna
--
Cori
Hi!
aalib is a prerequisite for the GGI packages, but the aalib maintainer
(hello Dr. Volker Zell) hasn't responded to my query [1] and neither
to the query by cgf [2], so here I am with a non-maintainer RFU...
Cheers,
Peter
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/cygwin-apps@cygwin.com/msg28529.html
[2
Hi Marco,
On Apr 1 17:11, marco atzeri wrote:
> I am building and testing openmpi-1.7.0rc9 on
> CYGWIN_NT-6.1 1.7.18(0.263/5/3) 2013-03-28 22:07 x86_64 Cygwin
> every looks fine except when all the processes on several cores
> end and should return to lunching program, something go wrong
> (of
13 matches
Mail list logo