I had written:
I think it is really not a good idea to have the same name for archives
of different packages. No other systems I know does this.
Christopher Faylor responded (for some reason not in my mailbox):
Just to kill two birds with one stone:
Il 8/11/2013 7:02 PM, Thomas Wolff ha scritto:
Please upload the updated packages for algol68g (both 32 and 64 bit):
...
I have managed meanwhile to package algol68g completely with cygport
(see my other thread which I will respond later) and will provide
another upload.
Update:
#src:
On Aug 14 09:40, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Il 8/11/2013 7:02 PM, Thomas Wolff ha scritto:
Please upload the updated packages for algol68g (both 32 and 64 bit):
...
I have managed meanwhile to package algol68g completely with
cygport (see my other thread which I will respond later) and will
Am 14.08.2013 09:49, schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
On Aug 14 09:40, Thomas Wolff wrote:
...
Update:
#src:
wget http://towo.net/algol68g/algol68g-2.7-0-src.tar.bz2
#32bit:
wget http://towo.net/algol68g/32/algol68g-2.7-0.tar.bz2
#64bit:
wget http://towo.net/algol68g/64/algol68g-2.7-0.tar.bz2
On Aug 14 10:09, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 14.08.2013 09:49, schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
On Aug 14 09:40, Thomas Wolff wrote:
...
Update:
#src:
wget http://towo.net/algol68g/algol68g-2.7-0-src.tar.bz2
#32bit:
wget http://towo.net/algol68g/32/algol68g-2.7-0.tar.bz2
#64bit:
wget
On Aug 14 16:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 14 09:43, Steve Rowley wrote:
However, /usr/bin/lockfile is still missing. Unpacking the procmail
3.22-12 tarball reveals that it contains only the
/usr/share/doc/procmail/ directory, and 4 small documentation files.
The rest of procmail is
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:35:55AM +0200, Thomas Wolff wrote:
I had written:
I think it is really not a good idea to have the same name for archives
of different packages. No other systems I know does this.
Christopher Faylor responded (for some reason not in my mailbox):
Just to kill two birds
Christopher Faylor writes:
The only differences in most of the arch-specific packages in Fedora are
the addition of a x86_64 and i686 to the package name. I think it would
be a good idea for us to do that too but it would require changes to
upset, genini and setup.exe.
...and cygport. BTW,
LS,
packages for gsl-1.16-1 are available here for upload:
wget -nH -np -r --cut-dirs=2
http://members.quicknet.nl/ar.burgers/cygwin/x86/gsl/
find x86 -name index.html* | xargs rm
wget -nH -np -r --cut-dirs=2
http://members.quicknet.nl/ar.burgers/cygwin/x86_64/gsl/
find x86_64 -name
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:29:44PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
Christopher Faylor writes:
The only differences in most of the arch-specific packages in Fedora are
the addition of a x86_64 and i686 to the package name. I think it would
be a good idea for us to do that too but it would require
wget -e robots=off -np -nH --cut-dirs=1 -R'index.html*' -r \
http://franke.dvrdns.org/cygwin/x86/release/cdrkit \
http://franke.dvrdns.org/cygwin/x86_64/release/cdrkit
The former (x86) cdrkit package is now marked obsolete and replaced by
cdrkit-doc.
An x86_64 cdrkit package does not
11 matches
Mail list logo
