On 5/2/2014 4:21 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Reini Urban writes:
It's vastly easier to keep perl_vendor than to split it up.
I've been looking at the test package for the upcoming 5.18.2 release
announced in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2014-04/msg00038.html
and I'd like to contest that ass
On 02/05/2014 17:31, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 25/04/2014 19:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 06:41:47PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Perhaps not, but having a maintainer is ;)
Ditto. And we are moving to .xz so...
cgf
in this case adding xz is not a big issue, I al
On 25/04/2014 19:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 06:41:47PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Perhaps not, but having a maintainer is ;)
Ditto. And we are moving to .xz so...
cgf
in this case adding xz is not a big issue, I already have them available
with minor adju
Reini Urban writes:
> It's vastly easier to keep perl_vendor than to split it up.
I've been looking at the test package for the upcoming 5.18.2 release
announced in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2014-04/msg00038.html
and I'd like to contest that assertion again.
TL;DR: I still propose to k
