Re: [ITP] Sendmail 8.14.9

2014-11-18 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-11-18 22:51, D. Boland wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Just FYI for the next time: You sent the announcement message to the wrong mailing list. Announcements should go to the (moderated) cygwin-announce mailing list, without the leading "[ANNOUNCEMENT]" in the subject line. After approv

Re: [ITP] Sendmail 8.14.9

2014-11-18 Thread D. Boland
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > On Nov 15 19:40, D. Boland wrote: > > > > BTW: The procmail package is also affected. Its postinstall script > > > > creates a > > > > local group 'mail' using 'net localgroup ...'. This should be changed, > > > > IMO. > > > > > > Ouch, I didn't see

Re: [RFC] incremental rebase

2014-11-18 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen writes: > That sounds complicated in terms of usage by maintainers. Maybe I > didn't quite grok the gist of the idea, so... given the number of > strata, how is a maintainer supposed to know what stratum a given > postinstall script should be? 0 and z are simple choices, but > ot

Re: [RFC] incremental rebase

2014-11-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 18 20:15, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > I'm glad for this initiative, but personally I don't have a strong > > opinion what's the best way to go forward. I'd just like to see some > > mechanism to allow what Achim's _autorebase replacement does, > > preferredly for _upda

Re: [RFC] incremental rebase

2014-11-18 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen writes: > I'm glad for this initiative, but personally I don't have a strong > opinion what's the best way to go forward. I'd just like to see some > mechanism to allow what Achim's _autorebase replacement does, > preferredly for _update-info-dir and other packages as well, and Ke

Re: Deleting just released nettle-3 package

2014-11-18 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-11-18 05:08, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: I just realized that gnutls cannot be build with the latest just uploaded nettle-3.0 packages for both architectures. Should I upload a version bumped nettle-2.7-2 package ? I don't think that will be necessary; 2.7-1 should revert to curr: automati

Re: [ITP] postfix 2.11.3

2014-11-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On November 17, 2014 7:00:10 PM CET, Christian Franke wrote: >Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Nov 17 15:50, Christian Franke wrote: >>> Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Nov 17 14:00, Christian Franke wrote: >> Also, is >> passwd -R r

Deleting just released nettle-3 package

2014-11-18 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Hi I just realized that gnutls cannot be build with the latest just uploaded nettle-3.0 packages for both architectures. Should I upload a version bumped nettle-2.7-2 package ? Then the nettle 3.0 specific files libnettle5-3.0-1.tar.xz libhogweed3-3.0-1.tar.xz libnettle-devel-3.0-1.tar.xz

Re: [RFC] incremental rebase

2014-11-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi guys, On Nov 17 20:08, Achim Gratz wrote: > Ken Brown writes: > > What I have in mind is simpler than this. There's nothing wrong with > > the existing texlive postinstall scripts except slowness, due to the > > repetition of time-consuming commands in different scripts. So I just > > need to