On 12/7/2014 6:36 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 7 11:45, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
The _update-info-dir script just collects all info files from /usr/info
and /usr/share/info and creates new "dir" using install-info. I was
hoping that the method from _{inc}autorebase co
On Dec 8 09:07, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 12/7/2014 6:36 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Dec 7 11:45, Achim Gratz wrote:
> >>Corinna Vinschen writes:
> >>>The _update-info-dir script just collects all info files from /usr/info
> >>>and /usr/share/info and creates new "dir" using install-info. I wa
Ken Brown writes:
> I'm not convinced that we need to worry so much about all these
> details. What if we just check (based on timestamps of files in
> /etc/setup/*.lst.gz) whether anything has been installed into
> /usr/info or /usr/share/info since we last did this check. If so,
> then just do
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> Fine with me. Except that we should probably get rid of /usr/info. As
> far as we can trust the package search, there's no package installing
> into /usr/info.
That's right, everything should go into /usr/share/info these days.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAV
On 12/8/2014 11:48 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Ken Brown writes:
I'm not convinced that we need to worry so much about all these
details. What if we just check (based on timestamps of files in
/etc/setup/*.lst.gz) whether anything has been installed into
/usr/info or /usr/share/info since we last di
The attached patch should fix the reported issue with handling of
packages with -X.Y release numbers.
Yaakov
2014-12-08 Yaakov Selkowitz
* package_source.cc (packagesource::set_canonical): Fix handling
of package release number containing a period.
Index: package_source.cc
==
On Dec 6, 2014, at 9:57 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Also, can we automate this?
If you’re suggesting an automatic promotion of package to Base, I’d argue for
the opposite: automatic detection of dependency creep.
I’ve got in mind the 2-3 times in my memory where Perl has crept into the
mini
> > Here's what I have at the moment based on your branch as of a few weeks
> > ago. However, with password-protected SSH keys, the password prompt
> > isn't handled properly. Any ideas?
>
> Re password prompts: I see the problem. It's because I echo the lftp
> script to stdout, and pipe it i
