Re: [RFC] cygport upload

2015-02-12 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 20:23 -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > I have created an upload branch in cygport git based on master with > > Andrew's upload work for further testing. > > FWIW, I've been using it to upload my packages since the last update on Jan. > 17, > and before that too, with no pro

Re: [RFC] cygport upload

2015-02-12 Thread Andrew Schulman
> I have created an upload branch in cygport git based on master with > Andrew's upload work for further testing. FWIW, I've been using it to upload my packages since the last update on Jan. 17, and before that too, with no problems. I always keep my ssh keys loaded in a running ssh-agent, so I'v

Re: [RFC] cygport upload

2015-02-12 Thread Andrew Schulman
> On 2/12/2015 11:42 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > I have created an upload branch in cygport git based on master with > > Andrew's upload work for further testing. > > > > I'm still undecided on $arch/!ready vs. $arch/release/$package/!ready. > > Thoughts? > > $arch/release/$package/!ready > >

Re: HEADSUP: Packages with obsolete dependencies

2015-02-12 Thread Andrew Schulman
> > > > ploticus Andrew Schulman > > > > > > This package needs to be updated and I've tried a few times to rebuild > > > it, but > > > the build always fails and so far I haven't been able to solve it. I'm > > > not > > > actively using it any more anyway, s

Re: [RFC] cygport upload

2015-02-12 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 23:51 +0100, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 2/12/2015 11:42 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > I have created an upload branch in cygport git based on master with > > Andrew's upload work for further testing. > > > > I'm still undecided on $arch/!ready vs. $arch/release/$package/!ready

Re: [RFC] cygport upload

2015-02-12 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 2/12/2015 11:42 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: I have created an upload branch in cygport git based on master with Andrew's upload work for further testing. I'm still undecided on $arch/!ready vs. $arch/release/$package/!ready. Thoughts? $arch/release/$package/!ready should avoid the "unlikel

[RFC] cygport upload

2015-02-12 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
I have created an upload branch in cygport git based on master with Andrew's upload work for further testing. I'm still undecided on $arch/!ready vs. $arch/release/$package/!ready. Thoughts? -- Yaakov

Re: cygport patches for TeX Live

2015-02-12 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 06:58 -0500, Ken Brown wrote: > On 2/11/2015 11:10 PM, Ken Brown wrote: > > On 2/11/2015 7:50 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > >> On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 16:46 -0500, Ken Brown wrote: > >>> In view of https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2015-01/msg00034.html, > >>> I'll use > >>> /va

Re: HEADSUP: Packages with obsolete dependencies

2015-02-12 Thread Jon TURNEY
On 11/02/2015 19:22, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 18:40 +, Jon TURNEY wrote: On 11/02/2015 04:14, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: ddd Jon Turney Done. As a workaround for the encoding issues seen with OpenMotif [1], ddd only uses the 'C'

Re: cygport patches for TeX Live

2015-02-12 Thread Ken Brown
On 2/11/2015 11:10 PM, Ken Brown wrote: On 2/11/2015 7:50 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 16:46 -0500, Ken Brown wrote: On 1/5/2015 12:52 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Ken Brown writes: Do you have an opinion about that? I suggested /etc/texmf/postinstall or /var/lib/texmf/postins