Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-22 Thread Achim Gratz
Ken Brown writes: > And indeed it does. I've still got a couple of things to clean up, > but I expect to upload a new clisp soon that no longer uses lisp.dll. > I hope that will solve the Maxima problem It doesn't… Instead of lisp.dll it now requires lisp.exe to be in $PATH and it produces an exe

Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-22 Thread Ken Brown
On 3/22/2015 4:50 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Ken Brown writes: And indeed it does. I've still got a couple of things to clean up, but I expect to upload a new clisp soon that no longer uses lisp.dll. I hope that will solve the Maxima problem It doesn't… Instead of lisp.dll it now requires lisp.ex

Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-22 Thread Ken Brown
On 3/22/2015 6:33 PM, Ken Brown wrote: On 3/22/2015 4:50 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Ken Brown writes: And indeed it does. I've still got a couple of things to clean up, but I expect to upload a new clisp soon that no longer uses lisp.dll. I hope that will solve the Maxima problem It doesn't… Ins

Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-22 Thread Achim Gratz
Ken Brown writes: >> So maybe you could dump a memory image maxima.mem and start it with a >> script that calls 'clisp -M maxima.mem'. I'm already doing that. :-) > I just took a look at the maxima package, and it seems that you > already use a script that does something like this in the absence