David Rothenberger writes:
New versions of subversion and net-snmp built against 5.22 are uploaded.
I've created subversion/!perl and net-snmp/!perl.
Thanks.
[I don't know how difficult that is to do quickly, but maybe consider
renaming these packages perl-net-snmp and perl-subversion.]
I
On 7/31/2015 2:44 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 7/31/2015 2:01 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Andrew Schulman writes:
I have a filter set up to flag messages with HEADSUP in the subject line as
important. So I always read those. Other maintainers are probably filtering on
HEADSUP in a similar way.
I
Andrew Schulman writes:
I have a filter set up to flag messages with HEADSUP in the subject line as
important. So I always read those. Other maintainers are probably filtering
on
HEADSUP in a similar way.
I wasn't aware that this was an agreed-upon keyword and I can't find
where it is
On 7/31/2015 2:01 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Andrew Schulman writes:
I have a filter set up to flag messages with HEADSUP in the subject line as
important. So I always read those. Other maintainers are probably filtering on
HEADSUP in a similar way.
I wasn't aware that this was an agreed-upon
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 18:13 -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
Leave aside that it seems brain-dead that I should have to rebuild my package
for such a triviality. Wouldn't it be nice if I could put the files into,
say,
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl, and not have to rebuild my package every time
I hope I gathered all responses correctly, please comment if I've got
anything wrong.
Jari and Volker are out on vacation or other business. Yaakov commented
we shouldn't hold the release for ming and I've just looked up Jari's
packages and they don't contain XS modules, so if anybody needs
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 21:13 +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
Jari and Volker are out on vacation or other business. Yaakov commented
we shouldn't hold the release for ming and I've just looked up Jari's
packages and they don't contain XS modules, so if anybody needs those
before Jari updates them we
Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
This is a good point; pure Perl modules should not need to be rebuilt
for every new Perl version.
As I've explained before, the impetus to rebuild even those is coming
from the large jump we're making with Perl for just this update, which
rolls up several user-visible
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 09:05 +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote:
for what I see Mark never updated the package after first release
in Sept 2012 and never provided a 64 bit version.
No, he did not.
The package is currently amanda-3.3.2-8 while upstream is at
3.3.7p1.
I built during weekend the
None of this discussion should detract from the amazing job you've done in
pulling this Perl update together. I hope you get several gold stars and/or
plush hippos for all your work.
Awarded! http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#AG
With the invaluable help of Yaakov and John on the server side, the mass
update of all things Perl is now complete. I would like to thank all
maintainers for helping with re-releases of their packages. I don't
know if that's my call to make, but I'd like to ask for a round of gold
stars for:
Andrew Schulman writes:
OK. I missed that thread. For the next time there's a Perl update that
requires action from us maintainers, it would help if you put a HEADSUP in
the subject line.
I've realized just in time that some maintainers don't read all of the
cygwin-apps list or even
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:42:53PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
With the invaluable help of Yaakov and John on the server side, the mass
update of all things Perl is now complete. I would like to thank all
maintainers for helping with re-releases of their packages. I don't
know if that's my
13 matches
Mail list logo
