Corinna Vinschen writes:
> Comments? On perl code? You're kidding...
Well, maybe not from you personally, to save you the exasperation. :-)
> You know, if you're willing to improve the long neglected genini, all
> power to you. I don't know how many people are actually using genini,
> but I'm
On Aug 18 20:34, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
> > I've just found that upset and genini will order versions differently.
>
> Here's a patch for genini that will take care of the versions in a
> better way than before, and it's extensible (in genini) and configurable
> (from setup.hint)
Achim Gratz writes:
> I've just found that upset and genini will order versions differently.
Here's a patch for genini that will take care of the versions in a
better way than before, and it's extensible (in genini) and configurable
(from setup.hint) if you're into that kind of thing. It's also l
Javier Martin writes:
> First of all thanks a lot for your answers. After reading this I
> have a couple of questions:
>
> - Is this going to be fixed and this package will be included again in
> the near future ?
The package is orphaned. Since you are here on this list, I think I
should remind
First of all thanks a lot for your answers. After reading this I
have a couple of questions:
- Is this going to be fixed and this package will be included again in
the near future ?
- Is is possible to install previous versions where this package was
included ?, how can I get this ? What is you