On 04/09/2015 15:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 4 14:56, Jon TURNEY wrote:
xwinwm: I think this can be classed as a 'failed experiment'
What does that mean in terms of the cygwin-pkg-list?
I guess it means that we won't make a 64 bit package.
Making xwinwm obsolete doesn't make much
On Sep 7 15:01, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> On 04/09/2015 15:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Sep 4 14:56, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> >>xwinwm: I think this can be classed as a 'failed experiment'
> >
> >What does that mean in terms of the cygwin-pkg-list?
>
> I guess it means that we won't make a 64 bit
