I'm new to this community so I wasn't sure if I went about this the proper way.
3.3.11 is the latest but is not listed as stable in the debian package list. I
was going by the guidelines on the contribution page that for it to be
considered for the repos that it has to be.
On March 15, 2016 11
On 16/03/2016 08:14, Wayne Porter wrote:
I'm new to this community so I wasn't sure if I went about this the proper way.
3.3.11 is the latest but is not listed as stable in the debian package list. I
was going by the guidelines on the contribution page that for it to be
considered for the repo
Ok, good to know. I was working on this as an exercise in porting code and saw
that the current version was quite old. Should I email the current maintainer
directly instead of putting it out on the mailing list?
On March 16, 2016 12:35:06 AM PDT, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>On 16/03/2016 08:14, Wayn
On 16/03/2016 08:42, Wayne Porter wrote:
Ok, good to know. I was working on this as an exercise in porting code and saw
that the current version was quite old. Should I email the current maintainer
directly instead of putting it out on the mailing list?
Hi Wayne,
please note
#1 never send
On Mar 16 00:14, Wayne Porter wrote:
>
> On March 15, 2016 11:52:35 PM PDT, Achim Gratz wrote:
> >Wayne Porter writes:
> >> I have just finished porting procps 3.3.9 and wanted to share it with
> >> the community.
> >
> >That's actually procps-ng or is it not? If so, it seems the current
> >vers
On Mar 16 10:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 16 00:14, Wayne Porter wrote:
> >
> > On March 15, 2016 11:52:35 PM PDT, Achim Gratz wrote:
> > >Wayne Porter writes:
> > >> I have just finished porting procps 3.3.9 and wanted to share it with
> > >> the community.
> > >
> > >That's actually pro
