Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 6/6/2016 6:39 PM, Ken Brown wrote: On 6/6/2016 6:23 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Ken Brown_update-info-dir This is obsolete and does nothing but require info, which is in Base anyway. Nothing depends on it, so it could just be removed. On second thought, maybe it should be

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On Jun 6, 2016, at 4:23 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > So far we have managed to reduce the download area by 20% (16.8 GiB) Nice! > which is great progress The next step, of course, is allowing multi-arch packages, so you can upload the -doc subpackage as noarch and

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 6/6/2016 6:23 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Ken Brown _update-info-dir This is obsolete and does nothing but require info, which is in Base anyway. Nothing depends on it, so it could just be removed. Ken

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-05-10 17:11, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Package Maintainers, cygport 0.22.0 is on its way to the mirrors. With this release, and thanks to Jon Turney's continuing work on calm (the replacement for upset which generates setup.ini), packages marked ARCH=noarch will be uploaded once under

Re: gcovr - Suitable for Cygwin?

On 06/06/16 20:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jun 6 10:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jun 4 19:10, David Stacey wrote: I've been using gcovr to generate coverage reports, and I'd be happy to maintain this for Cygwin. Before submitting a package, I'd be grateful if someone could check the

Re: gcovr - Suitable for Cygwin?

On Jun 6 10:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 4 19:10, David Stacey wrote: > > I've been using gcovr to generate coverage reports, and I'd be happy to > > maintain this for Cygwin. Before submitting a package, I'd be grateful if > > someone could check the licence [1]. > > > > It's a fairly

cygport patch for texlive

The attached patch, which I think is self-explanatory, was used for building TeX Live 2016. Ken From e75531985e354eb8d98eac8dd842b1fbed548533 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ken Brown Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 09:22:32 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] texlive: support generation of

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-05-11 16:31, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-05-11 16:02, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 11/05/2016 22:48, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: But what about the following? octave-nan octave-octcdf octave-stk octave-tsa /usr/lib/octave/packages/ contains the arch specific in this case in mex variant.

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-06-06 10:28, Ken Brown wrote: On 5/11/2016 10:00 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: These are moved to noarch now. Please let me know whenever you rebuild the others with the now-pushed change to cygport so they can be moved as well. I've rebuilt everything for TeX Live 2016 and am

Re: [ITP] libsass v3.3.6

2016-06-06 12:08 GMT+02:00 Marco Atzeri: > builds and packages fine, but I suggest you > > 1) to add > > DIFF_EXCLUDES="VERSION" > > to avoid the useless creation of libsass-3.3.6-1.src.patch Actually the patch isn't useless. It creates a VERSION file which version.sh expects to exist during the

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 5/11/2016 10:00 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-05-11 15:35, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-05-11 12:26, Ken Brown wrote: texlive-collection-fontsextra texlive-collection-fontsrecommended texlive-collection-genericextra texlive-collection-genericrecommended

Re: gcovr - Suitable for Cygwin?

David Stacey writes: > Note that gcovr isn't available for Fedora or CentOS, although this > could be because it hasn't been packaged for these distros, rather than > any incompatibility in the licence. It is, however, available for Debian > and Ubuntu [2]. Debian has it, of all

Re: [ITP] libsass v3.3.6

On 02/06/2016 17:09, Marcos Vives Del Sol wrote: LibSass is an open-source, MIT-licensed implementation in C++ of a CSS preprocessor for SASS and SCSS. It is already packed by several mainstream distros, such as Debian (https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/libsass) and Ubuntu

Re: gcovr - Suitable for Cygwin?

On Jun 4 19:10, David Stacey wrote: > I've been using gcovr to generate coverage reports, and I'd be happy to > maintain this for Cygwin. Before submitting a package, I'd be grateful if > someone could check the licence [1]. > > It's a fairly standard 3-clause BSD affair, but with the caveat