On 6/6/2016 6:39 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 6/6/2016 6:23 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Ken Brown_update-info-dir
This is obsolete and does nothing but require info, which is in Base
anyway. Nothing depends on it, so it could just be removed.
On second thought, maybe it should be kep
On Jun 6, 2016, at 4:23 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>
> So far we have managed to reduce the download area by 20% (16.8 GiB)
Nice!
> which is great progress
The next step, of course, is allowing multi-arch packages, so you can upload
the -doc subpackage as noarch and the binary subpackages as
On 6/6/2016 6:23 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Ken Brown _update-info-dir
This is obsolete and does nothing but require info, which is in Base
anyway. Nothing depends on it, so it could just be removed.
Ken
On 2016-05-10 17:11, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Package Maintainers,
cygport 0.22.0 is on its way to the mirrors. With this release, and
thanks to Jon Turney's continuing work on calm (the replacement for
upset which generates setup.ini), packages marked ARCH=noarch will be
uploaded once under the
On 06/06/16 20:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 6 10:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 4 19:10, David Stacey wrote:
I've been using gcovr to generate coverage reports, and I'd be happy to
maintain this for Cygwin. Before submitting a package, I'd be grateful if
someone could check the lice
On Jun 6 10:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 4 19:10, David Stacey wrote:
> > I've been using gcovr to generate coverage reports, and I'd be happy to
> > maintain this for Cygwin. Before submitting a package, I'd be grateful if
> > someone could check the licence [1].
> >
> > It's a fairly s
The attached patch, which I think is self-explanatory, was used for
building TeX Live 2016.
Ken
From e75531985e354eb8d98eac8dd842b1fbed548533 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ken Brown
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 09:22:32 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] texlive: support generation of language files
Up to now,
Marcos Vives Del Sol writes:
>> to avoid the useless creation of libsass-3.3.6-1.src.patch
> Actually the patch isn't useless. It creates a VERSION file which
> version.sh expects to exist during the building process. Without that
> file, the library reports version "[na]" instead of the correct 3.
On 2016-05-11 16:31, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-05-11 16:02, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 11/05/2016 22:48, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
But what about the following?
octave-nan
octave-octcdf
octave-stk
octave-tsa
/usr/lib/octave/packages/
contains the arch specific in this case in mex variant.
On 2016-06-06 10:28, Ken Brown wrote:
On 5/11/2016 10:00 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
These are moved to noarch now. Please let me know whenever you rebuild
the others with the now-pushed change to cygport so they can be moved as
well.
I've rebuilt everything for TeX Live 2016 and am uploading
2016-06-06 12:08 GMT+02:00 Marco Atzeri:
> builds and packages fine, but I suggest you
>
> 1) to add
>
> DIFF_EXCLUDES="VERSION"
>
> to avoid the useless creation of libsass-3.3.6-1.src.patch
Actually the patch isn't useless. It creates a VERSION file which
version.sh expects to exist during the bu
On 5/11/2016 10:00 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-05-11 15:35, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-05-11 12:26, Ken Brown wrote:
texlive-collection-fontsextra
texlive-collection-fontsrecommended
texlive-collection-genericextra
texlive-collection-genericrecommended
texlive-collection-langafrica
David Stacey writes:
> Note that gcovr isn't available for Fedora or CentOS, although this
> could be because it hasn't been packaged for these distros, rather than
> any incompatibility in the licence. It is, however, available for Debian
> and Ubuntu [2].
Debian has it, of all unlikely place
On 02/06/2016 17:09, Marcos Vives Del Sol wrote:
LibSass is an open-source, MIT-licensed implementation in C++ of a CSS
preprocessor for SASS and SCSS.
It is already packed by several mainstream distros, such as Debian
(https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/libsass) and Ubuntu
(http://packages.
On Jun 4 19:10, David Stacey wrote:
> I've been using gcovr to generate coverage reports, and I'd be happy to
> maintain this for Cygwin. Before submitting a package, I'd be grateful if
> someone could check the licence [1].
>
> It's a fairly standard 3-clause BSD affair, but with the caveat that
15 matches
Mail list logo
