On 7/23/16, 10:48 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>So you quoted my knee-jerk reaction but missed to quote the *real* point
>of my mail. Fixed that for you:
>
>> > Here's an idea: You both slap yourself and start talking to each
>>other.
>> >
>> > For the Windows *and* Cygwin world it would be
On Jul 23 16:43, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote:
> On 7/23/16, 3:40 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> >
> >no idea what's up between you, but this discussion is gross...
> >
> >My interest in both of your projects has just dwindled considerably.
>
> Corinna, understood. I think this may have been the
On 7/23/16, 3:40 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>no idea what's up between you, but this discussion is gross...
>
>My interest in both of your projects has just dwindled considerably.
Corinna, understood. I think this may have been the point.
I was planning to work for a solution for how to have
On Jul 23 00:23, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote:
> On 7/22/16, 12:56 PM, Adrien JUND wrote:
>
>
> >For information on your last release: curl -u "username"
> >https://api.github.com/repos/billziss-gh/winfsp/releases
> >=> winfsp-0.14.16197.msi - "download_count": 24
>
> This is beginning to feel a
On 7/22/16, 11:01 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>On 23/07/2016 02:31, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote:
>>Suppose I have a package XYZ that requires FUSE. Is it possible that the
>> “FUSE” dependency can be satisfied by either winfsp-fuse or dokan-fuse?
>>
>> If that is not possible it looks like we would have
On 23/07/2016 02:31, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote:
On 7/22/16, 12:57 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 22/07/2016 19:58, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote:
winfsp-fuse is a reasonable name.
dokan-fuse also (IMHO)
In the interest of moving things forward, I am happy to rename the
package. Is it possible for a
