Re: [ITA] cmake 3.12.0

2018-07-26 Thread Marco Atzeri
Am 26.07.2018 um 20:41 schrieb Achim Gratz: Marco Atzeri writes: I am trying to build and pack libuv. If I find no problem I will ITP it. It might be worth to wait for Cygwin 2.11 for this particular lib. Regards, Achim. Noted Marco --- Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf

Re: [ITA] cmake 3.12.0

2018-07-26 Thread Tony Kelman
> do you need a static lib ? > I saw some distri are packaging it. Presumably the static lib should go in a -devel package? I wouldn't want to link cmake to the static lib though, that would defeat the purpose of de-vendoring it and using separately packaged dependencies. > builds successfully ou

Re: [ITA] rsh-0.17-3

2018-07-26 Thread Andrew Schulman
> I would like to take over the maintenance of rsh package, which is > currently orphaned. 3 gold stars, for inetutils, rsh, and tcp_wrappers! https://cygwin.com/goldstars/#TY Andrew

Re: [ITA] cmake 3.12.0

2018-07-26 Thread Achim Gratz
Marco Atzeri writes: > I am trying to build and pack libuv. > If I find no problem I will ITP it. It might be worth to wait for Cygwin 2.11 for this particular lib. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldor

Re: [ITA/ITP] python-paramiko 2.4.1, python-bcrypt 3.1.4, python-PyNaCl 1.2.1

2018-07-26 Thread Michael Wild
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 9:52 PM Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 10:17 +0200, Michael Wild wrote: > > Another question: if you look at the cygport file > > > https://github.com/themiwi/cygwin/blob/master/python-paramiko/python-paramiko.cygport > , > > I jump through some hoops to g

Re: How to package a Python script

2018-07-26 Thread Michael Wild
Ok, thanks! That clears things up for me. On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 7:59 PM Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 16:55 +0200, Michael Wild wrote: > > How should I go about packaging a Python executable? Separate packages > > for python2 and python3? Only one of them? If so, which? If fo

Re: [ITA] cmake 3.12.0

2018-07-26 Thread Ivan Shynkarenka
> One of the main reasons I haven't put in the effort to update the cmake > package is that recent versions of cmake have new dependencies which it > vendors by default, which is not the way distros such as cygwin prefer to > build things. For a cygwin packaging build of cmake (as with other tools

Re: [ITA] cmake 3.12.0

2018-07-26 Thread Marco Atzeri
Am 26.07.2018 um 08:00 schrieb Marco Atzeri: In general is better to have a separate package for any dependency; it make much simpler to maintain all. I am trying to build and pack libuv. If I find no problem I will ITP it. Tony, do you need a static lib ? I saw some distri are packaging it.