Re: [cygport] enabling a replacement for "objdump -d -l"

2024-03-12 Thread Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps
On 2024-03-12 11:49, ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote: Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps writes: But I'm not being oblique here. I really do want comments. Well, adding comments or proper POD is about the same effort, so I'd tend towards the latter. I'm not sure what's so astounding about the suggestion

Re: [cygport] enabling a replacement for "objdump -d -l"

2024-03-12 Thread ASSI via Cygwin-apps
Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps writes: > But I'm not being oblique here. I really do want comments. Well, adding comments or proper POD is about the same effort, so I'd tend towards the latter. > I'm not sure what's so astounding about the suggestion that a fifty > line script should have some

Re: [cygport] enabling a replacement for "objdump -d -l"

2024-03-12 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
On 11/03/2024 19:35, ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote: Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps writes: [...] Fifty lines of perl with no comments! This is just line noise to me unless I spend lots of time staring at it :) That's what you get from an experiment that went rather more well than planned.